File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/1535685X.2017.1327695
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85021817601
- WOS: WOS:000413977500003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: When Silence Speaks: Press Censorship and Rule of Law in British Hong Kong, 1850s–1940s
Title | When Silence Speaks: Press Censorship and Rule of Law in British Hong Kong, 1850s–1940s |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | colonialism and law Hong Kong law and history press censorship rule of law |
Issue Date | 2017 |
Publisher | Routledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rlal20 |
Citation | Law and Literature, 2017, v. 29 n. 3, p. 425-456 How to Cite? |
Abstract | his article constitutes the first in-depth study of press censorship in British Hong Kong during the first century of colonial rule. By revealing how the press, the Chinese press in particular, was continuously and systematically monitored and pervasively censored through the collaborative efforts of executive actions, legislative provisions and judicial decisions, this article further posits that the common law system practiced in British Hong Kong during the period under study was complicit in the imposition of an authoritarian form of law and order, and was more interested in preserving the British Empire's overseas territorial and economic possessions and managing the power equation in the region than in safeguarding individual liberties in Hong Kong. Hong Kong is often praised for its rule-of-law colonial legacy, but this article argues that such narrative does not stand up to the scrutiny of archival study. The English law in Hong Kong history, rather than constituting a lens through which one can witness Hong Kong's quest for modernity, is more akin to a mirror reflecting an ongoing cycle of coercion and resistance through law. Drawing on unexplored archival sources, the article first discusses how the colonial government used libel lawsuits to punish the press for criticism of the government in the 19th century, before turning to describing in detail the daily mandatory vetting of Chinese newspapers by colonial censors under the office of the Secretary for Chinese Affairs and related prosecution cases in the early 20th century. The paper concludes with an exploration of the tension between the notion of a free press and the governance fears of the British Empire in the Far East revealed by this history of silencing the press in Hong Kong. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/245437 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 0.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.109 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ng, HKM | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-09-18T02:10:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2017-09-18T02:10:44Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Law and Literature, 2017, v. 29 n. 3, p. 425-456 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1535-685X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/245437 | - |
dc.description.abstract | his article constitutes the first in-depth study of press censorship in British Hong Kong during the first century of colonial rule. By revealing how the press, the Chinese press in particular, was continuously and systematically monitored and pervasively censored through the collaborative efforts of executive actions, legislative provisions and judicial decisions, this article further posits that the common law system practiced in British Hong Kong during the period under study was complicit in the imposition of an authoritarian form of law and order, and was more interested in preserving the British Empire's overseas territorial and economic possessions and managing the power equation in the region than in safeguarding individual liberties in Hong Kong. Hong Kong is often praised for its rule-of-law colonial legacy, but this article argues that such narrative does not stand up to the scrutiny of archival study. The English law in Hong Kong history, rather than constituting a lens through which one can witness Hong Kong's quest for modernity, is more akin to a mirror reflecting an ongoing cycle of coercion and resistance through law. Drawing on unexplored archival sources, the article first discusses how the colonial government used libel lawsuits to punish the press for criticism of the government in the 19th century, before turning to describing in detail the daily mandatory vetting of Chinese newspapers by colonial censors under the office of the Secretary for Chinese Affairs and related prosecution cases in the early 20th century. The paper concludes with an exploration of the tension between the notion of a free press and the governance fears of the British Empire in the Far East revealed by this history of silencing the press in Hong Kong. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Routledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rlal20 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Law and Literature | - |
dc.rights | Preprint: This is an Author's Original Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/[Article DOI]. Postprint: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/[Article DOI]. | - |
dc.subject | colonialism and law | - |
dc.subject | Hong Kong | - |
dc.subject | law and history | - |
dc.subject | press censorship | - |
dc.subject | rule of law | - |
dc.title | When Silence Speaks: Press Censorship and Rule of Law in British Hong Kong, 1850s–1940s | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ng, HKM: michaeln@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Ng, HKM=rp01638 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/1535685X.2017.1327695 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85021817601 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 278505 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 425 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 456 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000413977500003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1535-685X | - |