File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Understanding Depression from Different Paradigms: Toward an Eclectic Social Work Approach

TitleUnderstanding Depression from Different Paradigms: Toward an Eclectic Social Work Approach
Authors
KeywordsDepression
social constructivism
post-positivism
eclectic approach
Eastern paradigm
critical theory
Issue Date2016
Citation
British Journal of Social Work, 2016, v. 46, n. 3, p. 756-772 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2015 The Author. Depression is a significant mental health issue that many social workers encounter in their practice. There is great deal of theoretical and empirical knowledge concerning depression that stems from different paradigms. In this paper, we argue for the importance of understanding depression from four paradigms, post-positivism, social constructivism, critical theory and Eastern paradigm, and we illuminate how depression would be known and dealt with by these paradigmatic approaches. Given multiple paradigms available in understanding depression, we argue that social workers need to have the ability to appreciate and discern these different paradigms. Such ability can help strengthen social work practice. We further illustrate an eclectic approach that not only allows social workers to recognise the utilities and limitations of different paradigms, but also enables them to be dynamic, effectively addressing a range of issues when working with a service user who has depression.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246776
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.716
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Yu Te-
dc.contributor.authorFang, Lin-
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-26T04:27:57Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-26T04:27:57Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Social Work, 2016, v. 46, n. 3, p. 756-772-
dc.identifier.issn0045-3102-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/246776-
dc.description.abstract© 2015 The Author. Depression is a significant mental health issue that many social workers encounter in their practice. There is great deal of theoretical and empirical knowledge concerning depression that stems from different paradigms. In this paper, we argue for the importance of understanding depression from four paradigms, post-positivism, social constructivism, critical theory and Eastern paradigm, and we illuminate how depression would be known and dealt with by these paradigmatic approaches. Given multiple paradigms available in understanding depression, we argue that social workers need to have the ability to appreciate and discern these different paradigms. Such ability can help strengthen social work practice. We further illustrate an eclectic approach that not only allows social workers to recognise the utilities and limitations of different paradigms, but also enables them to be dynamic, effectively addressing a range of issues when working with a service user who has depression.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Social Work-
dc.subjectDepression-
dc.subjectsocial constructivism-
dc.subjectpost-positivism-
dc.subjecteclectic approach-
dc.subjectEastern paradigm-
dc.subjectcritical theory-
dc.titleUnderstanding Depression from Different Paradigms: Toward an Eclectic Social Work Approach-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bjsw/bcv135-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84966681470-
dc.identifier.volume46-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage756-
dc.identifier.epage772-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-263X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000375802800012-
dc.identifier.issnl0045-3102-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats