File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Globalization of World University Rankings and Its Impact on Asian Universities

TitleGlobalization of World University Rankings and Its Impact on Asian Universities
Authors
Ganotice, FATang, HHHTsui, CPGVillarosa, JBYeung, SS
Issue Date2016
PublisherIGI Global.
Citation
Globalization of World University Rankings and Its Impact on Asian Universities. In Downing, K & Ganotice, FA (Eds.), World University Rankings and the Future of Higher Education, p. 329-344. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2016 How to Cite?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0819-9.ch017
AbstractThis chapter discusses how Asian universities respond to the global prevalence of university rankings, which are operated in various form with different emphases. First, it defines the context and rationales of the rise of world university rankings. Next, it compares and contrasts the three dominant university rankings, namely, Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), and Times higher Education University Rankings (THE). After assessing the controversies, limitations and solutions of the dominant ranking systems, we will evaluate the current performance of Asian universities and discuss what lessons are to be learned by Asian universities amid the globalizing forces of world university ranking.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/248302
ISBN
9781522508199
ISSN
2326-9022
Series/Report no.Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership (AEMAL)

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGanotice, FA-
dc.contributor.authorTang, HHH-
dc.contributor.authorTsui, CPG-
dc.contributor.authorVillarosa, JB-
dc.contributor.authorYeung, SS-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T08:41:04Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-18T08:41:04Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationGlobalization of World University Rankings and Its Impact on Asian Universities. In Downing, K & Ganotice, FA (Eds.), World University Rankings and the Future of Higher Education, p. 329-344. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2016-
dc.identifier.isbn9781522508199-
dc.identifier.issn2326-9022-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/248302-
dc.description.abstractThis chapter discusses how Asian universities respond to the global prevalence of university rankings, which are operated in various form with different emphases. First, it defines the context and rationales of the rise of world university rankings. Next, it compares and contrasts the three dominant university rankings, namely, Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU), Quacquarelli Symonds (QS), and Times higher Education University Rankings (THE). After assessing the controversies, limitations and solutions of the dominant ranking systems, we will evaluate the current performance of Asian universities and discuss what lessons are to be learned by Asian universities amid the globalizing forces of world university ranking.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherIGI Global.-
dc.relation.ispartofWorld University Rankings and the Future of Higher Education-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAdvances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership (AEMAL)-
dc.titleGlobalization of World University Rankings and Its Impact on Asian Universities-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailGanotice, FJA: ganotc75@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailYeung, SS: siusze@eduhk.hk-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.4018/978-1-5225-0819-9.ch017-
dc.identifier.hkuros281069-
dc.identifier.hkuros314556-
dc.identifier.spage329-
dc.identifier.epage344-
dc.identifier.eissn2326-9030-
dc.publisher.placeHershey, PA-
dc.identifier.issnl2326-9022-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats