File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Problems with Wednesbury Unreasonableness in Contract Law: Lessons from Public Law
Title | Problems with Wednesbury Unreasonableness in Contract Law: Lessons from Public Law |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Wednesbury Unreasonableness Braganza Contract Law Contractual Discretion Administrative Discretion |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | Sweet & Maxwell Ltd. |
Citation | The Law Quarterly Review, 2019, v. 135 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This article identifies three key problems with the English courts’ current use of Wednesbury unreasonableness to control the exercise of discretion in contract law. First, there are misconceptions about the nature of Wednesbury review in contract law. Second, the intensity with which courts should apply Wednesbury unreasonableness is unclear. Finally, the contents of Wednesbury unreasonableness have been considered vague, leading to uncertainty in its application. This article proposes solutions to each of these problems by examining the jurisprudence and discourse on Wednesbury unreasonableness in public law. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/251304 |
ISSN | |
SSRN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lim, E | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, CSW | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-26T06:34:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-26T06:34:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The Law Quarterly Review, 2019, v. 135 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0023-933X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/251304 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article identifies three key problems with the English courts’ current use of Wednesbury unreasonableness to control the exercise of discretion in contract law. First, there are misconceptions about the nature of Wednesbury review in contract law. Second, the intensity with which courts should apply Wednesbury unreasonableness is unclear. Finally, the contents of Wednesbury unreasonableness have been considered vague, leading to uncertainty in its application. This article proposes solutions to each of these problems by examining the jurisprudence and discourse on Wednesbury unreasonableness in public law. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Sweet & Maxwell Ltd. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Law Quarterly Review | - |
dc.subject | Wednesbury Unreasonableness | - |
dc.subject | Braganza | - |
dc.subject | Contract Law | - |
dc.subject | Contractual Discretion | - |
dc.subject | Administrative Discretion | - |
dc.title | Problems with Wednesbury Unreasonableness in Contract Law: Lessons from Public Law | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chan, CSW: corachan@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Chan, CSW=rp01296 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 293971 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 135 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.ssrn | 3103348 | - |
dc.identifier.hkulrp | 2018/010 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0023-933X | - |