File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: An systematic review of E-learning outcomes in undergraduate dental radiology curricula – levels of learning and implications for researchers and curriculum planners

TitleAn systematic review of E-learning outcomes in undergraduate dental radiology curricula – levels of learning and implications for researchers and curriculum planners
Authors
KeywordsSystematic review
Dental radiology
Education
E-learning
Online learning
Issue Date2019
PublisherBritish Institute of Radiology. The Journal's web site is located at http://dmfr.birjournals.org/
Citation
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2019, v. 48 n. 1, article no. 20180027 How to Cite?
AbstractOBJECTIVES: To examine the outcomes of e-learning or blended learning interventions in undergraduate dental radiology curricula and analyze the nature of the knowledge levels addressed in learning interventions. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using a search strategy based on MeSH key words specific to the focus question and indexed in the MEDLINE database. The search again was supplemented by hand-searching of selected journals. Data were extracted relating to outcomes of knowledge and student perceptions. Analysis of the e-learning intervention was performed using a new framework to examine the level of knowledge undertaken: (1) remember/understand (2) analysis or evaluation or diagnosis and (3) performance (“knows how” or “shows how”). RESULTS: From the selected 17 papers, 11 were positive about student reported outcomes of the interventions, and 8 reported evidence that e-learning interventions enhanced learning. Out of the included studies, 8 used e-learning at the level of remember/understand, 4 at the level of analysis/evaluate/diagnosis, and 5 at the level of performance (“knows how,” “shows how”). CONCLUSIONS: The learning objectives, e-learning intervention, outcome measures and reporting methods were diverse and not well reported. This makes comparison between studies and an understanding of how interventions contributed to learning impractical. Future studies need to define “knowledge” levels and performance tasks undertaken in the planning and execution of e-learning interventions and their assessment methods. Such a framework and approach will focus our understanding in what ways e-learning is effective and how it contributes to better evidence-based e-learning experiences.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/258027
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.816
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBotelho, MG-
dc.contributor.authorAgrawal, KR-
dc.contributor.authorBornstein, MM-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-22T01:31:47Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-22T01:31:47Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationDentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2019, v. 48 n. 1, article no. 20180027-
dc.identifier.issn0250-832X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/258027-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To examine the outcomes of e-learning or blended learning interventions in undergraduate dental radiology curricula and analyze the nature of the knowledge levels addressed in learning interventions. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed using a search strategy based on MeSH key words specific to the focus question and indexed in the MEDLINE database. The search again was supplemented by hand-searching of selected journals. Data were extracted relating to outcomes of knowledge and student perceptions. Analysis of the e-learning intervention was performed using a new framework to examine the level of knowledge undertaken: (1) remember/understand (2) analysis or evaluation or diagnosis and (3) performance (“knows how” or “shows how”). RESULTS: From the selected 17 papers, 11 were positive about student reported outcomes of the interventions, and 8 reported evidence that e-learning interventions enhanced learning. Out of the included studies, 8 used e-learning at the level of remember/understand, 4 at the level of analysis/evaluate/diagnosis, and 5 at the level of performance (“knows how,” “shows how”). CONCLUSIONS: The learning objectives, e-learning intervention, outcome measures and reporting methods were diverse and not well reported. This makes comparison between studies and an understanding of how interventions contributed to learning impractical. Future studies need to define “knowledge” levels and performance tasks undertaken in the planning and execution of e-learning interventions and their assessment methods. Such a framework and approach will focus our understanding in what ways e-learning is effective and how it contributes to better evidence-based e-learning experiences.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBritish Institute of Radiology. The Journal's web site is located at http://dmfr.birjournals.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofDentomaxillofacial Radiology-
dc.rightsRepublished with permission of British Institute of Radiology, © 2019, from Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2019, v. 48 n. 1, article no. 20180027.-
dc.subjectSystematic review-
dc.subjectDental radiology-
dc.subjectEducation-
dc.subjectE-learning-
dc.subjectOnline learning-
dc.titleAn systematic review of E-learning outcomes in undergraduate dental radiology curricula – levels of learning and implications for researchers and curriculum planners-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailBotelho, MG: botelho@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailAgrawal, KR: kalp26@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailBornstein, MM: bornst@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityBotelho, MG=rp00033-
dc.identifier.authorityBornstein, MM=rp02217-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/dmfr.20180027-
dc.identifier.pmid30028185-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6398914-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85058933720-
dc.identifier.hkuros287185-
dc.identifier.volume48-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 20180027-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 20180027-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000453231900004-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0250-832X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats