File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: How Difficult Is Inference of Mammalian Causal Gene Regulatory Networks?

TitleHow Difficult Is Inference of Mammalian Causal Gene Regulatory Networks?
Authors
Issue Date2014
Citation
PLoS ONE, 2014, v. 9, n. 11 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2014 Djordjevic et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) play a central role in systems biology, especially in the study of mammalian organ development. One key question remains largely unanswered: Is it possible to infer mammalian causal GRNs using observable gene co-expression patterns alone? We assembled two mouse GRN datasets (embryonic tooth and heart) and matching microarray gene expression profiles to systematically investigate the difficulties of mammalian causal GRN inference. The GRNs were assembled based on <2,000 pieces of experimental genetic perturbation evidence from manually reading <150 primary research articles. Each piece of perturbation evidence records the qualitative change of the expression of one gene following knock-down or over-expression of another gene. Our data have thorough annotation of tissue types and embryonic stages, as well as the type of regulation (activation, inhibition and no effect), which uniquely allows us to estimate both sensitivity and specificity of the inference of tissue specific causal GRN edges. Using these unprecedented datasets, we found that gene co-expression does not reliably distinguish true positive from false positive interactions, making inference of GRN in mammalian development very difficult. Nonetheless, if we have expression profiling data from genetic or molecular perturbation experiments, such as gene knock-out or signalling stimulation, it is possible to use the set of differentially expressed genes to recover causal regulatory relationships with good sensitivity and specificity. Our result supports the importance of using perturbation experimental data in causal network reconstruction. Furthermore, we showed that causal gene regulatory relationship can be highly cell type or developmental stage specific, suggesting the importance of employing expression profiles from homogeneous cell populations. This study provides essential datasets and empirical evidence to guide the development of new GRN inference methods for mammalian organ development.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/262674
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDjordjevic, Djordje-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Andrian-
dc.contributor.authorZadoorian, Armella-
dc.contributor.authorRungrugeecharoen, Kevin-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Joshua W.K.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-08T02:46:42Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-08T02:46:42Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE, 2014, v. 9, n. 11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/262674-
dc.description.abstract© 2014 Djordjevic et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Gene regulatory networks (GRNs) play a central role in systems biology, especially in the study of mammalian organ development. One key question remains largely unanswered: Is it possible to infer mammalian causal GRNs using observable gene co-expression patterns alone? We assembled two mouse GRN datasets (embryonic tooth and heart) and matching microarray gene expression profiles to systematically investigate the difficulties of mammalian causal GRN inference. The GRNs were assembled based on <2,000 pieces of experimental genetic perturbation evidence from manually reading <150 primary research articles. Each piece of perturbation evidence records the qualitative change of the expression of one gene following knock-down or over-expression of another gene. Our data have thorough annotation of tissue types and embryonic stages, as well as the type of regulation (activation, inhibition and no effect), which uniquely allows us to estimate both sensitivity and specificity of the inference of tissue specific causal GRN edges. Using these unprecedented datasets, we found that gene co-expression does not reliably distinguish true positive from false positive interactions, making inference of GRN in mammalian development very difficult. Nonetheless, if we have expression profiling data from genetic or molecular perturbation experiments, such as gene knock-out or signalling stimulation, it is possible to use the set of differentially expressed genes to recover causal regulatory relationships with good sensitivity and specificity. Our result supports the importance of using perturbation experimental data in causal network reconstruction. Furthermore, we showed that causal gene regulatory relationship can be highly cell type or developmental stage specific, suggesting the importance of employing expression profiles from homogeneous cell populations. This study provides essential datasets and empirical evidence to guide the development of new GRN inference methods for mammalian organ development.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleHow Difficult Is Inference of Mammalian Causal Gene Regulatory Networks?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0111661-
dc.identifier.pmid25369032-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84932093797-
dc.identifier.volume9-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spagenull-
dc.identifier.epagenull-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000344402000083-
dc.identifier.f1000725223355-
dc.identifier.issnl1932-6203-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats