File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: No cage, no tube: Relative stabilities of nanostructures

TitleNo cage, no tube: Relative stabilities of nanostructures
Authors
Issue Date2008
Citation
Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2008, v. 112, n. 34, p. 13200-13203 How to Cite?
AbstractRelative stabilities of nanostructures are important in the design and selection of components for nanodevices. Here, we use first-principles simulations to evaluate the relative stabilities of representative nanostructures of semimetal Bi, semiconductive C, and metallic Au. The Bincages are metastable and highly active and can readily transform to more stable three-dimensional amorphous structures upon activation. Both finite bismuth nanotubes and infinite nanotubes are even less stable than the cage structures. This is contrary to the cases for carbon, boron, and gold. The differences lie in their bonding characteristics and their responses to curvature. Our findings show tendencies of evolution of different types of nanostructures and also indicate that if a nanocage is (not) stable, then its nanotube is even more (less) stable. Hence, the stability of a cage structure predetermines the existence of a nanotube for a given element: i.e., no cage, no tube. © 2008 American Chemical Society.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/262925
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.177
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.401
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, S. F.-
dc.contributor.authorGao, Liming-
dc.contributor.authorGong, X. G.-
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Z. X.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-08T09:28:50Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-08T09:28:50Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Physical Chemistry C, 2008, v. 112, n. 34, p. 13200-13203-
dc.identifier.issn1932-7447-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/262925-
dc.description.abstractRelative stabilities of nanostructures are important in the design and selection of components for nanodevices. Here, we use first-principles simulations to evaluate the relative stabilities of representative nanostructures of semimetal Bi, semiconductive C, and metallic Au. The Bincages are metastable and highly active and can readily transform to more stable three-dimensional amorphous structures upon activation. Both finite bismuth nanotubes and infinite nanotubes are even less stable than the cage structures. This is contrary to the cases for carbon, boron, and gold. The differences lie in their bonding characteristics and their responses to curvature. Our findings show tendencies of evolution of different types of nanostructures and also indicate that if a nanocage is (not) stable, then its nanotube is even more (less) stable. Hence, the stability of a cage structure predetermines the existence of a nanotube for a given element: i.e., no cage, no tube. © 2008 American Chemical Society.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Physical Chemistry C-
dc.titleNo cage, no tube: Relative stabilities of nanostructures-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1021/jp8052289-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-51849146216-
dc.identifier.volume112-
dc.identifier.issue34-
dc.identifier.spage13200-
dc.identifier.epage13203-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-7455-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000258633600025-
dc.identifier.issnl1932-7447-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats