File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Book Chapter: Invalidation Judgement: Implications to the Reform of Short-Term Patent System and IP Court

TitleInvalidation Judgement: Implications to the Reform of Short-Term Patent System and IP Court
Authors
Issue Date2017
PublisherCity University of Hong Kong Press.
Citation
Invalidation Judgement: Implications to the Reform of Short-Term Patent System and IP Court . In Liu, KC (Eds.), Annotated Leading Patent Cases in Major Asian Jurisdictions, p. 69-82. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press, 2017 How to Cite?
AbstractThis is a recent patent infringement case in Hong Kong, which involves a short term patent No. 1150416 for a construction method for extracting building piles in the ground. The plaintiff claimed that its short term patent was infringed by the defendant, while the defendant raised the defense of patent invalidity due to lack of sufficient disclosure and lack of novelty and inventive steps. The High Court invalidated the patent, and dismissed the claim of infringement. However, its reasoning leaves room for improvement, and implicates the need for further reform of Hong Kong’s short-term patent system but not the court system.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/263755
ISBN
Series/Report no.ARCIALA Asian IP Law Series

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Y-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-22T07:43:59Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-22T07:43:59Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationInvalidation Judgement: Implications to the Reform of Short-Term Patent System and IP Court . In Liu, KC (Eds.), Annotated Leading Patent Cases in Major Asian Jurisdictions, p. 69-82. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press, 2017-
dc.identifier.isbn9789629373078-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/263755-
dc.description.abstractThis is a recent patent infringement case in Hong Kong, which involves a short term patent No. 1150416 for a construction method for extracting building piles in the ground. The plaintiff claimed that its short term patent was infringed by the defendant, while the defendant raised the defense of patent invalidity due to lack of sufficient disclosure and lack of novelty and inventive steps. The High Court invalidated the patent, and dismissed the claim of infringement. However, its reasoning leaves room for improvement, and implicates the need for further reform of Hong Kong’s short-term patent system but not the court system.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherCity University of Hong Kong Press.-
dc.relation.ispartofAnnotated Leading Patent Cases in Major Asian Jurisdictions-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesARCIALA Asian IP Law Series-
dc.titleInvalidation Judgement: Implications to the Reform of Short-Term Patent System and IP Court-
dc.typeBook_Chapter-
dc.identifier.emailLi, Y: yali@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLi, Y=rp01260-
dc.identifier.hkuros295446-
dc.identifier.spage69-
dc.identifier.epage82-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats