File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Toward a better assessment of perceived social influence: The relative role of significant others on young athletes

TitleToward a better assessment of perceived social influence: The relative role of significant others on young athletes
Authors
KeywordsCoaching style
Friendship
Interpersonal relationship
Parenting
Social interaction
Unconditional response
Issue Date2019
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0838
Citation
Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2019, v. 29 n. 2, p. 286-298 How to Cite?
AbstractThe purpose of this three‐study paper was to develop and validate the Perceived Social Influence in Sport Scale‐2 (PSISS‐2) that aimed to resolve the limitations of PSISS‐1 in assessing the relative social influence of significant others in youth sport. In Study 1, a pool of 60 items generated from revisiting a qualitative dataset about significant others of young athletes were examined by two expert panel reviews in terms of content validity, clarity, coverage, and age‐appropriateness, leading to the development of 16 items of the PSISS‐2. In Study 2, multi‐group exploratory structural equation model for PSISS‐2 was conducted among 904 young athletes, and the results supported a model comprising positive influence (ie, conditional and unconditional positive influence combined), punishment (ie, conditional negative influence), and dysfunction (ie, unconditional negative influence) as three factors. The goodness of fit of the three‐factor model was acceptable and invariant across the coach‐, father‐, mother‐, and teammates‐versions of PSISS‐2. In support of the criterion validity of PSISS‐2, the three factors explained substantial variance of young athletes’ perceived competence, effort, enjoyment, and trait anxiety in sport. Study 3 examined the relationship between PSISS‐2 factors, psychological need support, and controlling behaviors in a subsample of 452 young athletes, and the findings supported the concurrent validity and discriminant validity of the scale. In conclusion, the data are supportive of PSISS‐2. The three factors of the scale (ie, positive influence, punishment, and dysfunction) may form a new framework for understanding and comparing the relative role of significant others in youth sport.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/265951
ISSN
2020 Impact Factor: 4.221
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.575
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, DKC-
dc.contributor.authorKeegan, RJ-
dc.contributor.authorLee, SYA-
dc.contributor.authorYang, SX-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, LEI-
dc.contributor.authorRhodes, RE-
dc.contributor.authorLonsdale, C-
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-17T02:16:21Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-17T02:16:21Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2019, v. 29 n. 2, p. 286-298-
dc.identifier.issn0905-7188-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/265951-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this three‐study paper was to develop and validate the Perceived Social Influence in Sport Scale‐2 (PSISS‐2) that aimed to resolve the limitations of PSISS‐1 in assessing the relative social influence of significant others in youth sport. In Study 1, a pool of 60 items generated from revisiting a qualitative dataset about significant others of young athletes were examined by two expert panel reviews in terms of content validity, clarity, coverage, and age‐appropriateness, leading to the development of 16 items of the PSISS‐2. In Study 2, multi‐group exploratory structural equation model for PSISS‐2 was conducted among 904 young athletes, and the results supported a model comprising positive influence (ie, conditional and unconditional positive influence combined), punishment (ie, conditional negative influence), and dysfunction (ie, unconditional negative influence) as three factors. The goodness of fit of the three‐factor model was acceptable and invariant across the coach‐, father‐, mother‐, and teammates‐versions of PSISS‐2. In support of the criterion validity of PSISS‐2, the three factors explained substantial variance of young athletes’ perceived competence, effort, enjoyment, and trait anxiety in sport. Study 3 examined the relationship between PSISS‐2 factors, psychological need support, and controlling behaviors in a subsample of 452 young athletes, and the findings supported the concurrent validity and discriminant validity of the scale. In conclusion, the data are supportive of PSISS‐2. The three factors of the scale (ie, positive influence, punishment, and dysfunction) may form a new framework for understanding and comparing the relative role of significant others in youth sport.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1600-0838-
dc.relation.ispartofScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports-
dc.subjectCoaching style-
dc.subjectFriendship-
dc.subjectInterpersonal relationship-
dc.subjectParenting-
dc.subjectSocial interaction-
dc.subjectUnconditional response-
dc.titleToward a better assessment of perceived social influence: The relative role of significant others on young athletes-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChan, DKC: derwin.chan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, DKC=rp02068-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/sms.13320-
dc.identifier.pmid30320928-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85056001306-
dc.identifier.hkuros296309-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage286-
dc.identifier.epage298-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000456093700015-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0905-7188-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats