File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/bju.14677
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85062970946
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy – a new era of prostate cancer diagnosis
Title | Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy – a new era of prostate cancer diagnosis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bjui.org/ |
Citation | The 23rd Hong Kong Urological Assoication Annual Scientific Meeting, Hong Kong, 4 November 2018. In BJU International, v. 123 n. S1, p. 6 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective:
MRI‐TRUS fusion targeted biopsy (TB) has been available in our centre since 2015. We herein compare MRI‐TRUS fusion prostate biopsy with standard 12‐core systematic biopsy (SB).
Patients and Methods:
Data of Chinese patients undergone prostate biopsy in Queen Mary Hospital from July 2015 to April 2018 were prospectively collected. We investigate the overall and csPCa detection rate of TB + SB and SB.
Results:
382 patients were included in our study. Multi‐parametric MRI (mpMRI) had NPV 100% for patients with PI‐RADS score ≤ 2. The overall cancer detection rate of TB + SB for first‐time biopsy in patients with PI‐RADS 3–5 lesions was 47.4%, significantly higher than 31.8% in SB (p = 0.006). Significance was also observed in repeat biopsy setting (24.7% vs 14.7%, p = 0.047). TB alone would have detected 41.6% less clinically insignificant PCa and missed 13.6% of csPCa.
The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that adding mpMRI PI‐RADS grading to other clinical predictors had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95% CI 0.82–0.92) for prediction of any grade and csPCa.
Conclusions:
MRI‐US fusion biopsy is a promising modality in prostate cancer diagnosis and will benefit patients in both first‐time and repeat biopsy setting. |
Description | Oral presentation |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/266488 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.337 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lai, TCT | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ma, WK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, AKC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, ACS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tsang, CF | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, PW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, SHB | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, ATL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tsu, HLJ | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-18T08:20:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-18T08:20:37Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The 23rd Hong Kong Urological Assoication Annual Scientific Meeting, Hong Kong, 4 November 2018. In BJU International, v. 123 n. S1, p. 6 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1464-4096 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/266488 | - |
dc.description | Oral presentation | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: MRI‐TRUS fusion targeted biopsy (TB) has been available in our centre since 2015. We herein compare MRI‐TRUS fusion prostate biopsy with standard 12‐core systematic biopsy (SB). Patients and Methods: Data of Chinese patients undergone prostate biopsy in Queen Mary Hospital from July 2015 to April 2018 were prospectively collected. We investigate the overall and csPCa detection rate of TB + SB and SB. Results: 382 patients were included in our study. Multi‐parametric MRI (mpMRI) had NPV 100% for patients with PI‐RADS score ≤ 2. The overall cancer detection rate of TB + SB for first‐time biopsy in patients with PI‐RADS 3–5 lesions was 47.4%, significantly higher than 31.8% in SB (p = 0.006). Significance was also observed in repeat biopsy setting (24.7% vs 14.7%, p = 0.047). TB alone would have detected 41.6% less clinically insignificant PCa and missed 13.6% of csPCa. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that adding mpMRI PI‐RADS grading to other clinical predictors had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95% CI 0.82–0.92) for prediction of any grade and csPCa. Conclusions: MRI‐US fusion biopsy is a promising modality in prostate cancer diagnosis and will benefit patients in both first‐time and repeat biopsy setting. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bjui.org/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | BJU International | - |
dc.rights | Preprint This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Postprint This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. | - |
dc.title | Magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy – a new era of prostate cancer diagnosis | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ma, WK: mwk054@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lam, PW: lamwayne@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ho, SHB: hobrian@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ng, ATL: ada5022@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Tsu, HLJ: jamestsu@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lam, PW=rp02305 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/bju.14677 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85062970946 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 296745 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 123 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | S1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 6 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1464-4096 | - |