File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: ACR appropriateness criteria nonsurgical treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer: Poor performance status or palliative intent

TitleACR appropriateness criteria nonsurgical treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer: Poor performance status or palliative intent
Authors
Keywordspalliation
Appropriateness criteria
non-small-cell lung cancer
radiation therapy
Issue Date2013
Citation
Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2013, v. 10, n. 9, p. 654-664 How to Cite?
AbstractRadiation therapy plays a potential curative role in the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with locoregional disease who are not surgical candidates and a palliative role for patients with metastatic disease. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a relatively new technique in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. A trial from RTOG® reported >97% local control at 3 years. For patients with locally advanced disease, thoracic radiation to a dose of 60 Gy remains the standard of care. Sequential chemotherapy or radiation alone can be used for patients with poor performance status who cannot tolerate more aggressive approaches. Chemotherapy should be used for patients with metastatic disease. Radiation therapy is useful for palliation of symptomatic tumors, and a dose of approximately 30 Gy is commonly used. Endobronchial brachytherapy is useful for patients with symptomatic endobronchial tumors. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. © 2013 American College of Radiology.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266766
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.912
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRosenzweig, Kenneth E.-
dc.contributor.authorChang, Joe Yujiao-
dc.contributor.authorChetty, Indrin J.-
dc.contributor.authorDecker, Roy H.-
dc.contributor.authorGinsburg, Mark E.-
dc.contributor.authorKestin, Larry L.-
dc.contributor.authorKong, Feng Ming-
dc.contributor.authorLally, Brian E.-
dc.contributor.authorLanger, Corey J.-
dc.contributor.authorMovsas, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorVidetic, Gregory M.M.-
dc.contributor.authorWillers, Henning-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-31T07:19:31Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-31T07:19:31Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American College of Radiology, 2013, v. 10, n. 9, p. 654-664-
dc.identifier.issn1546-1440-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266766-
dc.description.abstractRadiation therapy plays a potential curative role in the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer with locoregional disease who are not surgical candidates and a palliative role for patients with metastatic disease. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is a relatively new technique in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. A trial from RTOG<sup>®</sup> reported >97% local control at 3 years. For patients with locally advanced disease, thoracic radiation to a dose of 60 Gy remains the standard of care. Sequential chemotherapy or radiation alone can be used for patients with poor performance status who cannot tolerate more aggressive approaches. Chemotherapy should be used for patients with metastatic disease. Radiation therapy is useful for palliation of symptomatic tumors, and a dose of approximately 30 Gy is commonly used. Endobronchial brachytherapy is useful for patients with symptomatic endobronchial tumors. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment. © 2013 American College of Radiology.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American College of Radiology-
dc.subjectpalliation-
dc.subjectAppropriateness criteria-
dc.subjectnon-small-cell lung cancer-
dc.subjectradiation therapy-
dc.titleACR appropriateness criteria nonsurgical treatment for non-small-cell lung cancer: Poor performance status or palliative intent-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jacr.2013.05.031-
dc.identifier.pmid23890874-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84883552147-
dc.identifier.volume10-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spage654-
dc.identifier.epage664-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-349X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000324723300007-
dc.identifier.issnl1546-1440-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats