File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Facilitating adaptation and intercultural contact: The role of integration and multicultural ideology in dominant and non-dominant groups

TitleFacilitating adaptation and intercultural contact: The role of integration and multicultural ideology in dominant and non-dominant groups
Authors
KeywordsAdaptation
Integration
Multiculturalism
Intercultural contact
Acculturation
Issue Date2015
Citation
International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2015, v. 45, p. 70-84 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2015. Research on acculturation has documented that adaptation to a receiving society is affected by both the immigrants' acculturation strategies and the dominant group's expectations about how immigrants should acculturate. However, the acculturation expectations have received relatively less attention from researchers, and support for multiculturalism has rarely been examined from the perspective of immigrants. The present study used the framework of the Mutual Intercultural Relations in Plural Societies (MIRIPS) project to investigate the acculturation experiences and intercultural relations in Hong Kong by incorporating mutual views of both the dominant and non-dominant groups. It also tested the mediating role of the dominant group's tolerance towards different cultural groups and the non-dominant group's perceived discrimination. Two community samples were recruited, including Hong Kong residents (N=181) and immigrants from Mainland China (N=182). Among Mainland immigrants, the integration strategy predicted both psychological adaptation and sociocultural adaptation. Multicultural ideology predicted psychological adaptation and played a significant role in intercultural contact with Hong Kong people through the mediation of lower perceived discrimination. Among Hong Kong residents, the integration expectation predicted psychological adaptation. Multicultural ideology indirectly affected intercultural contact with Mainland immigrants through the mediation of greater tolerance. These results suggest that the integration strategy and expectation are more important to intrapersonal functioning, whereas multicultural ideology may be more crucial in facilitating social interactions between members of the society of settlement and immigrants in culturally plural milieus. Future research should test the proposed models of dominant and non-dominant groups in other cultures.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266999
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.938
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.807
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHui, Bryant Pui Hung-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Sylvia Xiaohua-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Cynthia Man-
dc.contributor.authorBerry, John W.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-31T07:20:13Z-
dc.date.available2019-01-31T07:20:13Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2015, v. 45, p. 70-84-
dc.identifier.issn0147-1767-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/266999-
dc.description.abstract© 2015. Research on acculturation has documented that adaptation to a receiving society is affected by both the immigrants' acculturation strategies and the dominant group's expectations about how immigrants should acculturate. However, the acculturation expectations have received relatively less attention from researchers, and support for multiculturalism has rarely been examined from the perspective of immigrants. The present study used the framework of the Mutual Intercultural Relations in Plural Societies (MIRIPS) project to investigate the acculturation experiences and intercultural relations in Hong Kong by incorporating mutual views of both the dominant and non-dominant groups. It also tested the mediating role of the dominant group's tolerance towards different cultural groups and the non-dominant group's perceived discrimination. Two community samples were recruited, including Hong Kong residents (N=181) and immigrants from Mainland China (N=182). Among Mainland immigrants, the integration strategy predicted both psychological adaptation and sociocultural adaptation. Multicultural ideology predicted psychological adaptation and played a significant role in intercultural contact with Hong Kong people through the mediation of lower perceived discrimination. Among Hong Kong residents, the integration expectation predicted psychological adaptation. Multicultural ideology indirectly affected intercultural contact with Mainland immigrants through the mediation of greater tolerance. These results suggest that the integration strategy and expectation are more important to intrapersonal functioning, whereas multicultural ideology may be more crucial in facilitating social interactions between members of the society of settlement and immigrants in culturally plural milieus. Future research should test the proposed models of dominant and non-dominant groups in other cultures.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Intercultural Relations-
dc.subjectAdaptation-
dc.subjectIntegration-
dc.subjectMulticulturalism-
dc.subjectIntercultural contact-
dc.subjectAcculturation-
dc.titleFacilitating adaptation and intercultural contact: The role of integration and multicultural ideology in dominant and non-dominant groups-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.01.002-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84924358879-
dc.identifier.volume45-
dc.identifier.spage70-
dc.identifier.epage84-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000352244400007-
dc.identifier.issnl0147-1767-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats