File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1161218
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84961626101
- PMID: 27019092
- WOS: WOS:000390848200007
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The accuracy of the 24-h activity recall method for assessing sedentary behaviour: the physical activity measurement survey (PAMS) project
Title | The accuracy of the 24-h activity recall method for assessing sedentary behaviour: the physical activity measurement survey (PAMS) project |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | adults Sedentary behaviour validity accelerometer physical activity recall |
Issue Date | 2017 |
Citation | Journal of Sports Sciences, 2017, v. 35, n. 3, p. 255-261 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Sedentary behaviour (SB) has emerged as a modifiable risk factor, but little is known about measurement errors of SB. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of 24-h Physical Activity Recall (24PAR) relative to SenseWear Armband (SWA) for assessing SB. Each participant (n = 1485) undertook a series of data collection procedures on two randomly selected days: wearing a SWA for full 24-h, and then completing the telephone-administered 24PAR the following day to recall the past 24-h activities. Estimates of total sedentary time (TST) were computed without the inclusion of reported or recorded sleep time. Equivalence testing was used to compare estimates of TST. Analyses from equivalence testing showed no significant equivalence of 24PAR for TST (90% CI: 443.0 and 457.6 min · day–1) relative to SWA (equivalence zone: 580.7 and 709.8 min · day–1). Bland–Altman plots indicated individuals that were extremely or minimally sedentary provided relatively comparable sedentary time between 24PAR and SWA. Overweight/obese and/or older individuals were more likely to under-estimate sedentary time than normal weight and/or younger individuals. Measurement errors of 24PAR varied by the level of sedentary time and demographic indicators. This evidence informs future work to develop measurement error models to correct for errors of self-reports. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/267029 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.115 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Youngwon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Welk, Gregory J. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-31T07:20:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-31T07:20:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Sports Sciences, 2017, v. 35, n. 3, p. 255-261 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0264-0414 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/267029 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Sedentary behaviour (SB) has emerged as a modifiable risk factor, but little is known about measurement errors of SB. The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of 24-h Physical Activity Recall (24PAR) relative to SenseWear Armband (SWA) for assessing SB. Each participant (n = 1485) undertook a series of data collection procedures on two randomly selected days: wearing a SWA for full 24-h, and then completing the telephone-administered 24PAR the following day to recall the past 24-h activities. Estimates of total sedentary time (TST) were computed without the inclusion of reported or recorded sleep time. Equivalence testing was used to compare estimates of TST. Analyses from equivalence testing showed no significant equivalence of 24PAR for TST (90% CI: 443.0 and 457.6 min · day–1) relative to SWA (equivalence zone: 580.7 and 709.8 min · day–1). Bland–Altman plots indicated individuals that were extremely or minimally sedentary provided relatively comparable sedentary time between 24PAR and SWA. Overweight/obese and/or older individuals were more likely to under-estimate sedentary time than normal weight and/or younger individuals. Measurement errors of 24PAR varied by the level of sedentary time and demographic indicators. This evidence informs future work to develop measurement error models to correct for errors of self-reports. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Sports Sciences | - |
dc.subject | adults | - |
dc.subject | Sedentary behaviour | - |
dc.subject | validity | - |
dc.subject | accelerometer | - |
dc.subject | physical activity recall | - |
dc.title | The accuracy of the 24-h activity recall method for assessing sedentary behaviour: the physical activity measurement survey (PAMS) project | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/02640414.2016.1161218 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 27019092 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84961626101 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 35 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 255 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 261 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1466-447X | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000390848200007 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0264-0414 | - |