File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s00784-018-2363-8
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85041924395
- PMID: 29429068
- WOS: WOS:000441292600024
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Title | Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Medium-term stability Class III children Maxillary protraction therapy Systematic review and meta-analysis Skeletal and dental changes |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Citation | Clinical Oral Investigations, 2018, v. 22, n. 7, p. 2639-2652 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability of treatment effects of maxillary protraction therapy in Class III children. Materials and methods: Multiple electronic databases were searched from 01/1996 to 10/2016. Randomized clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, and cohort studies with untreated Class III controls and a follow-up over 2 years were considered for inclusion. The methodological quality of the studies and publication bias were evaluated. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of six variables (SNA, SNB, ANB, mandibular plane angle, overjet, and lower incisor angle) were calculated. Results: Ten studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and four studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Compared with the control group, after treatment, the treated group showed significant changes: SNA +1.79° (95% CI: 1.23, 2.34), SNB −1.16° (95% CI −2.08, −0.24), ANB +2.92° (95% CI 2.40, 3.44), mandibular plane angle +1.41° (95% CI 0.63, 2.20), overjet +3.94 mm (95% CI 2.17, 5.71) and lower incisor angle −3.07° (95% CI −4.92, −1.22). During follow-up, the changes in five variables reflected significant relapse. Overall, the treated group showed significant changes only in ANB +1.66° (95% CI 0.97, 2.35) and overjet +2.41 mm (95% CI 1.60, 3.23). Conclusions: Maxillary protraction can be a short-term effective therapy and might improve sagittal skeletal and dental relationships in the medium term. But some skeletal and dental variables showed significant relapse during the follow-up period. Long-term studies are still required to further evaluate its skeletal benefits. Clinical relevance: The study evaluated the medium-term stability of skeletal and dental effects of maxillary protraction in Class III children and discussed whether the therapy can reduce the need for orthognathic surgery. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/267598 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.942 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lin, Yifan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Guo, Runzhi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hou, Liyu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fu, Zhen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Li, Weiran | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-22T04:08:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-22T04:08:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Investigations, 2018, v. 22, n. 7, p. 2639-2652 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1432-6981 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/267598 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability of treatment effects of maxillary protraction therapy in Class III children. Materials and methods: Multiple electronic databases were searched from 01/1996 to 10/2016. Randomized clinical trials, controlled clinical trials, and cohort studies with untreated Class III controls and a follow-up over 2 years were considered for inclusion. The methodological quality of the studies and publication bias were evaluated. Mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of six variables (SNA, SNB, ANB, mandibular plane angle, overjet, and lower incisor angle) were calculated. Results: Ten studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and four studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Compared with the control group, after treatment, the treated group showed significant changes: SNA +1.79° (95% CI: 1.23, 2.34), SNB −1.16° (95% CI −2.08, −0.24), ANB +2.92° (95% CI 2.40, 3.44), mandibular plane angle +1.41° (95% CI 0.63, 2.20), overjet +3.94 mm (95% CI 2.17, 5.71) and lower incisor angle −3.07° (95% CI −4.92, −1.22). During follow-up, the changes in five variables reflected significant relapse. Overall, the treated group showed significant changes only in ANB +1.66° (95% CI 0.97, 2.35) and overjet +2.41 mm (95% CI 1.60, 3.23). Conclusions: Maxillary protraction can be a short-term effective therapy and might improve sagittal skeletal and dental relationships in the medium term. But some skeletal and dental variables showed significant relapse during the follow-up period. Long-term studies are still required to further evaluate its skeletal benefits. Clinical relevance: The study evaluated the medium-term stability of skeletal and dental effects of maxillary protraction in Class III children and discussed whether the therapy can reduce the need for orthognathic surgery. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Investigations | - |
dc.subject | Medium-term stability | - |
dc.subject | Class III children | - |
dc.subject | Maxillary protraction therapy | - |
dc.subject | Systematic review and meta-analysis | - |
dc.subject | Skeletal and dental changes | - |
dc.title | Stability of maxillary protraction therapy in children with Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00784-018-2363-8 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 29429068 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85041924395 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 22 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 2639 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 2652 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1436-3771 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000441292600024 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1432-6981 | - |