File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: From public health research to health promotion policy: On the 10 major contradictions

TitleFrom public health research to health promotion policy: On the 10 major contradictions
Authors
KeywordsEvidence-based policy
Research transfer
Health promotion program funding and evaluation
Health policy decision-making
Issue Date2004
Citation
Social and Preventive Medicine, 2004, v. 49, n. 3, p. 179-184 How to Cite?
AbstractThe rise of evidence-based medicine has given impetus to calls for more research evidence to be incorporated into health policy. The difficulty in effecting this research transfer has often been attributed to the different "worlds" of researchers and policy-makers. There are other contradictions, however, that must be addressed in attempting to bridge public health research and health promotion policy. These include such issues as: what forms of evidence are required, what types of research are usually funded, the limited scope and duration of health promotion programs, how health policies are formulated, contemporary public sector management reforms, and so on. These contradictions need to be recognized and managed if closer links are to be formed between public health research and health promotion policy. © Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2004.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/269802
ISSN
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, Vivian-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-06T01:38:57Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-06T01:38:57Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationSocial and Preventive Medicine, 2004, v. 49, n. 3, p. 179-184-
dc.identifier.issn0303-8408-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/269802-
dc.description.abstractThe rise of evidence-based medicine has given impetus to calls for more research evidence to be incorporated into health policy. The difficulty in effecting this research transfer has often been attributed to the different "worlds" of researchers and policy-makers. There are other contradictions, however, that must be addressed in attempting to bridge public health research and health promotion policy. These include such issues as: what forms of evidence are required, what types of research are usually funded, the limited scope and duration of health promotion programs, how health policies are formulated, contemporary public sector management reforms, and so on. These contradictions need to be recognized and managed if closer links are to be formed between public health research and health promotion policy. © Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2004.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSocial and Preventive Medicine-
dc.subjectEvidence-based policy-
dc.subjectResearch transfer-
dc.subjectHealth promotion program funding and evaluation-
dc.subjectHealth policy decision-making-
dc.titleFrom public health research to health promotion policy: On the 10 major contradictions-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00038-004-3083-1-
dc.identifier.pmid15224539-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84964297845-
dc.identifier.volume49-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage179-
dc.identifier.epage184-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000222108300003-
dc.identifier.issnl0303-8408-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats