File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Relationships among diabetic retinopathy, antioxidants, and glycemic control

TitleRelationships among diabetic retinopathy, antioxidants, and glycemic control
Authors
Keywordstype 2 diabetes
retinopathy
oxidative stress
antioxidants
Issue Date2011
Citation
Optometry and Vision Science, 2011, v. 88, n. 2, p. 251-256 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is increasing worldwide and affects ∼11% of the Hong Kong population. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common cause of vision loss in type 2 DM. Risk of DR is increased by poor glycemic control, elevated lipids, and blood pressure, but it is not possible to predict the development or progression of DR at an individual level. Increased oxidative stress is thought to play a role. The use of a wider biomarker profile incorporating biomarkers of antioxidant status and oxidative stress may aid identification of individuals at higher risk or at very early stages of developing DR. Methods. Four hundred twenty type 2 DM subjects without diabetic complications were investigated. Eyes were examined for DR and anterior and posterior ocular segment pathology. DR was graded according to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study criteria. Demographic data were collected. Traditional risk factors plus biomarkers of antioxidant status and oxidative stress in fasting blood and urine were determined. Results. Overall DR prevalence was 89%. No significant differences in any demographic measures or biomarkers were found among those subjects with different DR grades, or in those without DR. Significant correlations (p < 0.0001) between HbA1c and DNA damage, (ρ = 0.32) and fasting plasma glucose and DNA damage (ρ = 0.52) were seen. DNA damage was also significantly and inversely correlated (p < 0.0001) with both plasma ascorbic acid (ρ = -0.41) and plasma total antioxidant level (ρ = -0.21). Conclusions.DR prevalence was very high in this group, but no biomarker differences were seen in those with DR compared to those free of DR, or in those with different degrees of severity of DR. This group of 420 subjects is being followed up to investigate whether the extended biomarker profile at baseline is related to progression of and/or incident DR. Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Optometry.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/271465
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.585
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, Carly S.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorBenzie, Iris F.F.-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Siu Wai-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Lily Y.L.-
dc.contributor.authorYeung, Vincent T.F.-
dc.contributor.authorWoo, George C.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-02T07:16:08Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-02T07:16:08Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationOptometry and Vision Science, 2011, v. 88, n. 2, p. 251-256-
dc.identifier.issn1040-5488-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/271465-
dc.description.abstractPurpose. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is increasing worldwide and affects ∼11% of the Hong Kong population. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common cause of vision loss in type 2 DM. Risk of DR is increased by poor glycemic control, elevated lipids, and blood pressure, but it is not possible to predict the development or progression of DR at an individual level. Increased oxidative stress is thought to play a role. The use of a wider biomarker profile incorporating biomarkers of antioxidant status and oxidative stress may aid identification of individuals at higher risk or at very early stages of developing DR. Methods. Four hundred twenty type 2 DM subjects without diabetic complications were investigated. Eyes were examined for DR and anterior and posterior ocular segment pathology. DR was graded according to Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study criteria. Demographic data were collected. Traditional risk factors plus biomarkers of antioxidant status and oxidative stress in fasting blood and urine were determined. Results. Overall DR prevalence was 89%. No significant differences in any demographic measures or biomarkers were found among those subjects with different DR grades, or in those without DR. Significant correlations (p < 0.0001) between HbA1c and DNA damage, (ρ = 0.32) and fasting plasma glucose and DNA damage (ρ = 0.52) were seen. DNA damage was also significantly and inversely correlated (p < 0.0001) with both plasma ascorbic acid (ρ = -0.41) and plasma total antioxidant level (ρ = -0.21). Conclusions.DR prevalence was very high in this group, but no biomarker differences were seen in those with DR compared to those free of DR, or in those with different degrees of severity of DR. This group of 420 subjects is being followed up to investigate whether the extended biomarker profile at baseline is related to progression of and/or incident DR. Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Optometry.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofOptometry and Vision Science-
dc.subjecttype 2 diabetes-
dc.subjectretinopathy-
dc.subjectoxidative stress-
dc.subjectantioxidants-
dc.titleRelationships among diabetic retinopathy, antioxidants, and glycemic control-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/OPX.0b013e318208494a-
dc.identifier.pmid21217409-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79551566313-
dc.identifier.volume88-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage251-
dc.identifier.epage256-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000286584900012-
dc.identifier.issnl1040-5488-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats