File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evaluation of five silane coupling agents on resin-titanium adhesion

TitleEvaluation of five silane coupling agents on resin-titanium adhesion
Authors
KeywordsAdhesion
bis-GMA resin
SilanisationTitanium and titanium alloys
Issue Date2019
PublisherElsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijadhadh
Citation
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2019, v. 90, p. 132-137 How to Cite?
AbstractThe objective of this laboratory study was to evaluate the adhesion strength of 5 commercially available dental silane coupling agents (ESPE Sil™, Bis-silane™, Clearfil™ Ceramic Primer, VITASIL® and Cimara®) bonded with an experimental bis-GMA resin to silica-coated titanium. Materials and methods The silanes were applied onto tribochemically silica-coated planar titanium surfaces followed by addition of experimental bis-GMA resin stubs. The specimens (n = 10) were subjected to 3 different conditions: 1) dry storage for 24 h (baseline), 2) thermo-cycling interval (6000 cycles, 5–55 °C) and 3) storage in de-ionized water at 37 °C for 6 months respectively. Adhesion strengths of the resin to titanium were measured by using a universal testing machine. Surface examination was made with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) after the adhesion strength test. Data were analyzed with 2-way ANOVA with the Tukey's post hoc analysis (α = 0.05). Results The highest adhesion strength was obtained with VITASIL® stored in dry condition (22.8 ± 1.2 MPa), and the lowest value was obtained with Clearfil™ Ceramic Primer in thermo-cycling condition (2.2 ± 0.6 MPa). The type of storage condition significantly affected the adhesion strength in the following order: dry storage > water storage > thermo-cycling (P < 0.05) but no significant differences in adhesion strength were found among the 5 commercial silanes in same storage conditions (P = 0.06). Mixed (53%) and interfacial (37%) failures were more common than cohesive ones (10%). Conclusion Storage condition significantly affected the adhesion strength but the evaluated 5 dental silane coupling agents provided similar and clinical acceptable adhesion between resin and silica-coated titanium.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/272127
ISSN
2020 Impact Factor: 3.189
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.047
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHon, AK-
dc.contributor.authorMatinlinna, JP-
dc.contributor.authorShibata, Y-
dc.contributor.authorMiyazaki, T-
dc.contributor.authorPow, EHN-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-20T10:36:11Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-20T10:36:11Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 2019, v. 90, p. 132-137-
dc.identifier.issn0143-7496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/272127-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of this laboratory study was to evaluate the adhesion strength of 5 commercially available dental silane coupling agents (ESPE Sil™, Bis-silane™, Clearfil™ Ceramic Primer, VITASIL® and Cimara®) bonded with an experimental bis-GMA resin to silica-coated titanium. Materials and methods The silanes were applied onto tribochemically silica-coated planar titanium surfaces followed by addition of experimental bis-GMA resin stubs. The specimens (n = 10) were subjected to 3 different conditions: 1) dry storage for 24 h (baseline), 2) thermo-cycling interval (6000 cycles, 5–55 °C) and 3) storage in de-ionized water at 37 °C for 6 months respectively. Adhesion strengths of the resin to titanium were measured by using a universal testing machine. Surface examination was made with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) after the adhesion strength test. Data were analyzed with 2-way ANOVA with the Tukey's post hoc analysis (α = 0.05). Results The highest adhesion strength was obtained with VITASIL® stored in dry condition (22.8 ± 1.2 MPa), and the lowest value was obtained with Clearfil™ Ceramic Primer in thermo-cycling condition (2.2 ± 0.6 MPa). The type of storage condition significantly affected the adhesion strength in the following order: dry storage > water storage > thermo-cycling (P < 0.05) but no significant differences in adhesion strength were found among the 5 commercial silanes in same storage conditions (P = 0.06). Mixed (53%) and interfacial (37%) failures were more common than cohesive ones (10%). Conclusion Storage condition significantly affected the adhesion strength but the evaluated 5 dental silane coupling agents provided similar and clinical acceptable adhesion between resin and silica-coated titanium.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijadhadh-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives-
dc.subjectAdhesion-
dc.subjectbis-GMA resin-
dc.subjectSilanisationTitanium and titanium alloys-
dc.titleEvaluation of five silane coupling agents on resin-titanium adhesion-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHon, AK: honki@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailMatinlinna, JP: jpmat@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailPow, EHN: ehnpow@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityMatinlinna, JP=rp00052-
dc.identifier.authorityPow, EHN=rp00030-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2019.02.007-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85061747973-
dc.identifier.hkuros299066-
dc.identifier.volume90-
dc.identifier.spage132-
dc.identifier.epage137-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000461269700015-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0143-7496-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats