File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1139/cgj-2013-0157
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84961700348
- WOS: WOS:000349233400005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Computational investigation of baffle configuration on impedance of channelized debris flow
Title | Computational investigation of baffle configuration on impedance of channelized debris flow |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Flume modeling Interaction mechanisms Discrete element method Channelized debris flow Baffles |
Issue Date | 2014 |
Citation | Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2014, v. 52, n. 2, p. 182-197 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Channelized debris flows surge downslope in mountainous regions and have large impact forces. Arrays of debris flow baffles are frequently positioned in front of rigid barriers to engage torrents and attenuate flow energy. They are regularly designed on empirical and prescriptive basis because their interaction mechanism is not well understood. Numerical backanalysis of flume experiments using the discrete element method (DEM) is conducted to provide insight on flow interaction with an array of baffles. Varying configurations of baffle height, a second staggered row, and spacing between successive rows are examined. Upstream and downstream kinematics are monitored to capture and compare the Froude number, kinetic energy, and discharge resulting from each baffle configuration. Results from this study reveal that the height of baffles can be categorized relative to the initial approach flow depth (h), namely tall baffles (1.5h) and short baffles (0.75h). Tall baffles are characterized by the development of upstream subcritical flow conditions, whereas short baffles exhibit supercritical upstream conditions. Furthermore, tall baffles facilitate the suppression of overflow, and short baffles lead to excessive overflow that is supercritical in nature. Less flow attenuation occurs as the distance increases both upstream and downstream from each array of baffles. A second staggered row of short staggered baffles is ineffective in reducing debris kinetic energy, whereas tall baffles should be positioned as close as possible. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/273554 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.513 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Choi, C. E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, C. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Law, R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Song, D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwan, J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, K. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-12T09:55:55Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-12T09:55:55Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2014, v. 52, n. 2, p. 182-197 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0008-3674 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/273554 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Channelized debris flows surge downslope in mountainous regions and have large impact forces. Arrays of debris flow baffles are frequently positioned in front of rigid barriers to engage torrents and attenuate flow energy. They are regularly designed on empirical and prescriptive basis because their interaction mechanism is not well understood. Numerical backanalysis of flume experiments using the discrete element method (DEM) is conducted to provide insight on flow interaction with an array of baffles. Varying configurations of baffle height, a second staggered row, and spacing between successive rows are examined. Upstream and downstream kinematics are monitored to capture and compare the Froude number, kinetic energy, and discharge resulting from each baffle configuration. Results from this study reveal that the height of baffles can be categorized relative to the initial approach flow depth (h), namely tall baffles (1.5h) and short baffles (0.75h). Tall baffles are characterized by the development of upstream subcritical flow conditions, whereas short baffles exhibit supercritical upstream conditions. Furthermore, tall baffles facilitate the suppression of overflow, and short baffles lead to excessive overflow that is supercritical in nature. Less flow attenuation occurs as the distance increases both upstream and downstream from each array of baffles. A second staggered row of short staggered baffles is ineffective in reducing debris kinetic energy, whereas tall baffles should be positioned as close as possible. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Canadian Geotechnical Journal | - |
dc.subject | Flume modeling | - |
dc.subject | Interaction mechanisms | - |
dc.subject | Discrete element method | - |
dc.subject | Channelized debris flow | - |
dc.subject | Baffles | - |
dc.title | Computational investigation of baffle configuration on impedance of channelized debris flow | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1139/cgj-2013-0157 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84961700348 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 52 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 182 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 197 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1208-6010 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000349233400005 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0008-3674 | - |