File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s10346-016-0772-9
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84994434530
- WOS: WOS:000401697900010
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Dynamic response of flexible rockfall barriers under different loading geometries
Title | Dynamic response of flexible rockfall barriers under different loading geometries |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Rockfall Flexible barriers Finite-element analysis |
Issue Date | 2017 |
Citation | Landslides, 2017, v. 14, n. 3, p. 905-916 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Flexible steel barriers are commonly constructed on steep hillsides to mitigate rockfall. The evaluation of the dynamic response of proprietary flexible barriers is conventionally performed using full-scale field tests by dropping a weight onto the barriers in accordance with the European test standard ETAG 27. The weight typically has a spherical or polyhedral shape and cannot reproduce more complex rockfall scenarios encountered in the field. A rigid slab may load a barrier over a larger area and its effect has not been investigated. In this study, a calibrated three-dimensional finite-element model was developed to study the performance of vertically and horizontally orientated rockfall barriers under concentrated areal impact loads. A new bilinear force-displacement model was incorporated into the model to simulate the behavior of the energy-dissipating devices on the barriers. The effect of different weight geometries was studied by considering impacts by a rigid single spherical boulder and a rigid slab. Results reveal that areal loading induced by a rigid slab increases the loading on the barrier foundation by up to 40 % in both horizontally and vertically positioned barriers when compared to a concentrated load scenario with a single boulder. This indicates that barriers tested under the current test standard does not give the worst-case scenario in terms of foundation loads, and barrier designers should take into account the possible effect of increased foundation loads by reinforcing the barrier posts and/or increasing their spacing. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/273577 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.020 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Koo, Raymond C.H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kwan, Julian S.H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, Carlos | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, Charles W.W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yiu, Jack | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, Clarence E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, Axel K.L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, Ken K.S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pun, W. K. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-12T09:55:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-12T09:55:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Landslides, 2017, v. 14, n. 3, p. 905-916 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1612-510X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/273577 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Flexible steel barriers are commonly constructed on steep hillsides to mitigate rockfall. The evaluation of the dynamic response of proprietary flexible barriers is conventionally performed using full-scale field tests by dropping a weight onto the barriers in accordance with the European test standard ETAG 27. The weight typically has a spherical or polyhedral shape and cannot reproduce more complex rockfall scenarios encountered in the field. A rigid slab may load a barrier over a larger area and its effect has not been investigated. In this study, a calibrated three-dimensional finite-element model was developed to study the performance of vertically and horizontally orientated rockfall barriers under concentrated areal impact loads. A new bilinear force-displacement model was incorporated into the model to simulate the behavior of the energy-dissipating devices on the barriers. The effect of different weight geometries was studied by considering impacts by a rigid single spherical boulder and a rigid slab. Results reveal that areal loading induced by a rigid slab increases the loading on the barrier foundation by up to 40 % in both horizontally and vertically positioned barriers when compared to a concentrated load scenario with a single boulder. This indicates that barriers tested under the current test standard does not give the worst-case scenario in terms of foundation loads, and barrier designers should take into account the possible effect of increased foundation loads by reinforcing the barrier posts and/or increasing their spacing. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Landslides | - |
dc.subject | Rockfall | - |
dc.subject | Flexible barriers | - |
dc.subject | Finite-element analysis | - |
dc.title | Dynamic response of flexible rockfall barriers under different loading geometries | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10346-016-0772-9 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84994434530 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 14 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 905 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 916 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1612-5118 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000401697900010 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1612-510X | - |