File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Dynamic response of flexible rockfall barriers under different loading geometries

TitleDynamic response of flexible rockfall barriers under different loading geometries
Authors
KeywordsRockfall
Flexible barriers
Finite-element analysis
Issue Date2017
Citation
Landslides, 2017, v. 14, n. 3, p. 905-916 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Flexible steel barriers are commonly constructed on steep hillsides to mitigate rockfall. The evaluation of the dynamic response of proprietary flexible barriers is conventionally performed using full-scale field tests by dropping a weight onto the barriers in accordance with the European test standard ETAG 27. The weight typically has a spherical or polyhedral shape and cannot reproduce more complex rockfall scenarios encountered in the field. A rigid slab may load a barrier over a larger area and its effect has not been investigated. In this study, a calibrated three-dimensional finite-element model was developed to study the performance of vertically and horizontally orientated rockfall barriers under concentrated areal impact loads. A new bilinear force-displacement model was incorporated into the model to simulate the behavior of the energy-dissipating devices on the barriers. The effect of different weight geometries was studied by considering impacts by a rigid single spherical boulder and a rigid slab. Results reveal that areal loading induced by a rigid slab increases the loading on the barrier foundation by up to 40 % in both horizontally and vertically positioned barriers when compared to a concentrated load scenario with a single boulder. This indicates that barriers tested under the current test standard does not give the worst-case scenario in terms of foundation loads, and barrier designers should take into account the possible effect of increased foundation loads by reinforcing the barrier posts and/or increasing their spacing.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273577
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.020
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKoo, Raymond C.H.-
dc.contributor.authorKwan, Julian S.H.-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Charles W.W.-
dc.contributor.authorYiu, Jack-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Clarence E.-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Axel K.L.-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Ken K.S.-
dc.contributor.authorPun, W. K.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T09:55:59Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-12T09:55:59Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationLandslides, 2017, v. 14, n. 3, p. 905-916-
dc.identifier.issn1612-510X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273577-
dc.description.abstract© 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. Flexible steel barriers are commonly constructed on steep hillsides to mitigate rockfall. The evaluation of the dynamic response of proprietary flexible barriers is conventionally performed using full-scale field tests by dropping a weight onto the barriers in accordance with the European test standard ETAG 27. The weight typically has a spherical or polyhedral shape and cannot reproduce more complex rockfall scenarios encountered in the field. A rigid slab may load a barrier over a larger area and its effect has not been investigated. In this study, a calibrated three-dimensional finite-element model was developed to study the performance of vertically and horizontally orientated rockfall barriers under concentrated areal impact loads. A new bilinear force-displacement model was incorporated into the model to simulate the behavior of the energy-dissipating devices on the barriers. The effect of different weight geometries was studied by considering impacts by a rigid single spherical boulder and a rigid slab. Results reveal that areal loading induced by a rigid slab increases the loading on the barrier foundation by up to 40 % in both horizontally and vertically positioned barriers when compared to a concentrated load scenario with a single boulder. This indicates that barriers tested under the current test standard does not give the worst-case scenario in terms of foundation loads, and barrier designers should take into account the possible effect of increased foundation loads by reinforcing the barrier posts and/or increasing their spacing.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofLandslides-
dc.subjectRockfall-
dc.subjectFlexible barriers-
dc.subjectFinite-element analysis-
dc.titleDynamic response of flexible rockfall barriers under different loading geometries-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10346-016-0772-9-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84994434530-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage905-
dc.identifier.epage916-
dc.identifier.eissn1612-5118-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000401697900010-
dc.identifier.issnl1612-510X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats