File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effects of particle size and cushioning thickness on the performance of rock-filled gabions used in protection against boulder impact

TitleEffects of particle size and cushioning thickness on the performance of rock-filled gabions used in protection against boulder impact
Authors
KeywordsDiscrete element model
Debris flow boulder impact
Cushioning thickness
Particle size
Gabion
Issue Date2019
Citation
Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2019, v. 56, n. 2, p. 198-207 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2019, Canadian Science Publishing. All rights reserved. A gabion is one of the most commonly used cushioning layers to shield protection structures against boulders entrained in debris flow. Despite the prevalence of gabions, their cushioning performance is highly variable because of the wide range of rock sizes and cushioning thicknesses that are recommended in the literature. Correspondingly, the dynamic response of gabion cushioning layers varies dramatically. In this study, large-scale pendulum impact tests were used to calibrate a discrete element model. Subsequently, a parametric study was carried out to discern the effects of particle size and cushioning thickness on the impact load and transmitted load exerted by a boulder. Results reveal that as the particle size in the cushioning layer decreases, the force chains collapse more easily, and the expansion angle of strain energy increases. To optimize the performance of a gabion cushioning layer, practitioners should reduce the size of the particles to a normalized particle radius of about 0.1. A normalized particle radius less than 0.2 ensures that the expansion angle of strain energy is large enough — greater than 45° in this study — so as to enable load spreading across the barrier. To eliminate the effects of energy reflecting off the barrier and directed back to the point of impact, which augments the impact load, the cushioning layer thickness should be greater than three times the radius of the boulder.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273682
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.513
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSu, Y.-
dc.contributor.authorCui, Yifei-
dc.contributor.authorNg, C. W.W.-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, C. E.-
dc.contributor.authorKwan, J. S.H.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-12T09:56:21Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-12T09:56:21Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationCanadian Geotechnical Journal, 2019, v. 56, n. 2, p. 198-207-
dc.identifier.issn0008-3674-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/273682-
dc.description.abstract© 2019, Canadian Science Publishing. All rights reserved. A gabion is one of the most commonly used cushioning layers to shield protection structures against boulders entrained in debris flow. Despite the prevalence of gabions, their cushioning performance is highly variable because of the wide range of rock sizes and cushioning thicknesses that are recommended in the literature. Correspondingly, the dynamic response of gabion cushioning layers varies dramatically. In this study, large-scale pendulum impact tests were used to calibrate a discrete element model. Subsequently, a parametric study was carried out to discern the effects of particle size and cushioning thickness on the impact load and transmitted load exerted by a boulder. Results reveal that as the particle size in the cushioning layer decreases, the force chains collapse more easily, and the expansion angle of strain energy increases. To optimize the performance of a gabion cushioning layer, practitioners should reduce the size of the particles to a normalized particle radius of about 0.1. A normalized particle radius less than 0.2 ensures that the expansion angle of strain energy is large enough — greater than 45° in this study — so as to enable load spreading across the barrier. To eliminate the effects of energy reflecting off the barrier and directed back to the point of impact, which augments the impact load, the cushioning layer thickness should be greater than three times the radius of the boulder.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofCanadian Geotechnical Journal-
dc.subjectDiscrete element model-
dc.subjectDebris flow boulder impact-
dc.subjectCushioning thickness-
dc.subjectParticle size-
dc.subjectGabion-
dc.titleEffects of particle size and cushioning thickness on the performance of rock-filled gabions used in protection against boulder impact-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1139/cgj-2017-0370-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85060868233-
dc.identifier.hkuros311424-
dc.identifier.volume56-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage198-
dc.identifier.epage207-
dc.identifier.eissn1208-6010-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000457000200004-
dc.identifier.issnl0008-3674-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats