File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1038/s41571-019-0253-x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85070416981
- WOS: WOS:000497953300013
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Global Consultation on Cancer Staging: promoting consistent understanding and use
Title | Global Consultation on Cancer Staging: promoting consistent understanding and use |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | Nature Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nature.com/nrclinonc/index.html |
Citation | Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2019, v. 16, p. 763-771 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Disease burden is the most important determinant of survival in patients with cancer. This domain, reflected by the cancer stage and codified using the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, is a fundamental determinant of prognosis. Accurate and consistent tumour classification is required for the development and use of treatment guidelines and to enable clinical research (including clinical trials), cancer surveillance and control. Furthermore, knowledge of the extent and stage of disease is frequently important in the context of translational studies. Attempts to include additional prognostic factors in staging classifications, in order to facilitate a more accurate determination of prognosis, are often made with a lack of knowledge and understanding and are one of the main causes of the inconsistent use of terms and definitions. This effect has resulted in uncertainty and confusion, thus limiting the utility of the TNM classification. In this Position paper, we provide a consensus on the optimal use and terminology for cancer staging that emerged from a consultation process involving representatives of several major international organizations involved in cancer classification. The consultation involved several steps: a focused literature review; a stakeholder survey; and a consultation meeting. This aim of this Position paper is to provide a consensus that should guide the use of staging terminology and secure the classification of anatomical disease extent as a distinct aspect of cancer classification. © 2019, Springer Nature Limited. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/273859 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 81.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 21.048 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Brierley, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | O’Sullivan, B | - |
dc.contributor.author | Asamura, H | - |
dc.contributor.author | Byrd, D | - |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, SH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, A | - |
dc.contributor.author | Piñeros, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mason, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Moraes, FY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rösler, W | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rous, B | - |
dc.contributor.author | Torode, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | van Krieken, JH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gospodarowicz, M | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-18T14:50:04Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-18T14:50:04Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2019, v. 16, p. 763-771 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1759-4774 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/273859 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Disease burden is the most important determinant of survival in patients with cancer. This domain, reflected by the cancer stage and codified using the tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) classification, is a fundamental determinant of prognosis. Accurate and consistent tumour classification is required for the development and use of treatment guidelines and to enable clinical research (including clinical trials), cancer surveillance and control. Furthermore, knowledge of the extent and stage of disease is frequently important in the context of translational studies. Attempts to include additional prognostic factors in staging classifications, in order to facilitate a more accurate determination of prognosis, are often made with a lack of knowledge and understanding and are one of the main causes of the inconsistent use of terms and definitions. This effect has resulted in uncertainty and confusion, thus limiting the utility of the TNM classification. In this Position paper, we provide a consensus on the optimal use and terminology for cancer staging that emerged from a consultation process involving representatives of several major international organizations involved in cancer classification. The consultation involved several steps: a focused literature review; a stakeholder survey; and a consultation meeting. This aim of this Position paper is to provide a consensus that should guide the use of staging terminology and secure the classification of anatomical disease extent as a distinct aspect of cancer classification. © 2019, Springer Nature Limited. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Nature Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nature.com/nrclinonc/index.html | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.title | Global Consultation on Cancer Staging: promoting consistent understanding and use | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lee, A: awmlee@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lee, A=rp02056 | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41571-019-0253-x | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85070416981 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 302198 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 16 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 763 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 771 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000497953300013 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1759-4774 | - |