File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/21681163.2019.1566025
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85065426036
- WOS: WOS:000534250900002
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Analysis of sagittal profile of spine using 3D ultrasound imaging: a phantom study and preliminary subject test
Title | Analysis of sagittal profile of spine using 3D ultrasound imaging: a phantom study and preliminary subject test |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Spine Sagittal balance Cobb’s angle 3D ultrasound imaging Spinous process |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tciv20 |
Citation | Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization, 2020, v. 8 n. 3, p. 232-244 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Radiographic Cobb’s angle is the gold standard for evaluation of spinal curvature, however, X-ray is ionising. In contrast, ultrasound is non-ionising and inexpensive. However, no study has reported the reliability and accuracy of ultrasound on sagittal curvature analysis. Ultrasound and X-ray scanning were conducted on 16 sets of spine phantoms with different deformities. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, correlations, mean absolute differences (MAD) and linear regression of ultrasound spinous process angles (USSPA), X-ray spinous process angles (XSPA) and X-ray Cobb’s angles (XCA) together with the intra-operator reliability of USSPA were investigated. In addition, USSPA and XCA of five AIS subjects were obtained using the ultrasound system. In the phantom study, excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reproducibility for the three angles and excellent intra-operator reproducibility for USSPA were demonstrated. Good to moderate or better correlations were obtained among the angles. All three angles indicated positive linear relationships with MAD ≤ 6.0°. The results of the preliminary study demonstrated a high intra-reliability for the ultrasound measurements. The measured difference between the USSPA and XCA methods was 6.3° ± 5.4°. The results showed that ultrasound is feasible for measuring sagittal curvature and has the potential for monitoring the curve progression and evaluating sagittal spinal profiles. |
Description | Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/274170 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.486 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, TTY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, JCW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Law, SY | - |
dc.contributor.author | To, MKT | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, JPY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zheng, YP | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-18T14:56:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-18T14:56:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization, 2020, v. 8 n. 3, p. 232-244 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2168-1163 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/274170 | - |
dc.description | Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization | - |
dc.description.abstract | Radiographic Cobb’s angle is the gold standard for evaluation of spinal curvature, however, X-ray is ionising. In contrast, ultrasound is non-ionising and inexpensive. However, no study has reported the reliability and accuracy of ultrasound on sagittal curvature analysis. Ultrasound and X-ray scanning were conducted on 16 sets of spine phantoms with different deformities. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability, correlations, mean absolute differences (MAD) and linear regression of ultrasound spinous process angles (USSPA), X-ray spinous process angles (XSPA) and X-ray Cobb’s angles (XCA) together with the intra-operator reliability of USSPA were investigated. In addition, USSPA and XCA of five AIS subjects were obtained using the ultrasound system. In the phantom study, excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reproducibility for the three angles and excellent intra-operator reproducibility for USSPA were demonstrated. Good to moderate or better correlations were obtained among the angles. All three angles indicated positive linear relationships with MAD ≤ 6.0°. The results of the preliminary study demonstrated a high intra-reliability for the ultrasound measurements. The measured difference between the USSPA and XCA methods was 6.3° ± 5.4°. The results showed that ultrasound is feasible for measuring sagittal curvature and has the potential for monitoring the curve progression and evaluating sagittal spinal profiles. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tciv20 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering: Imaging and Visualization | - |
dc.rights | AOM/Preprint Before Accepted: his article has been accepted for publication in [JOURNAL TITLE], published by Taylor & Francis. AOM/Preprint After Accepted: This is an [original manuscript / preprint] of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI]. Accepted Manuscript (AM) i.e. Postprint This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI]. | - |
dc.subject | Spine | - |
dc.subject | Sagittal balance | - |
dc.subject | Cobb’s angle | - |
dc.subject | 3D ultrasound imaging | - |
dc.subject | Spinous process | - |
dc.title | Analysis of sagittal profile of spine using 3D ultrasound imaging: a phantom study and preliminary subject test | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | To, MKT: mikektto@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Cheung, JPY: cheungjp@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | To, MKT=rp00302 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Cheung, JPY=rp01685 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/21681163.2019.1566025 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85065426036 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 301542 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 8 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 232 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 244 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000534250900002 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2168-1163 | - |