File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1633659
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85068700520
- PMID: 31286838
- WOS: WOS:000477961800003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Bias-adjusted Kaplan–Meier survival curves for marginal treatment effect in observational studies
Title | Bias-adjusted Kaplan–Meier survival curves for marginal treatment effect in observational studies |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Balance of covariates distribution Kaplan–meier curve marginal treatment effect observational study subsets of covariates |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/10543406.asp |
Citation | Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 2019, v. 29 n. 4, p. 592-605 How to Cite? |
Abstract | For time-to-event outcomes, the Kaplan–Meier estimator is commonly used to estimate survival functions of treatment groups and to compute marginal treatment effects, such as the difference in survival rates between treatments at a landmark time. The derived estimates of the marginal treatment effect are uniformly consistent under general conditions when data are from randomized clinical trials. For data from observational studies, however, these statistical quantities are often biased due to treatment-selection bias. Propensity score-based methods estimate the survival function by adjusting for the disparity of propensity scores between treatment groups. Unfortunately, misspecification of the regression model can lead to biased estimates. Using an empirical likelihood (EL) method in which the moments of the covariate distribution of treatment groups are constrained to equality, we obtain consistent estimates of the survival functions and the marginal treatment effect. Equating moments of the covariate distribution between treatment groups simulate the covariate distribution that would have been obtained if the patients had been randomized to these treatment groups. We establish the consistency and the asymptotic limiting distribution of the proposed EL estimators. We demonstrate that the proposed estimator is robust to model misspecification. Simulation is used to study the finite sample properties of the proposed estimator. The proposed estimator is applied to a lung cancer observational study to compare two surgical procedures in treating early-stage lung cancer patients. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/274525 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.812 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wang, X | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bai, F | - |
dc.contributor.author | Pang, H | - |
dc.contributor.author | George, S | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-18T15:03:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-18T15:03:25Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 2019, v. 29 n. 4, p. 592-605 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1054-3406 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/274525 | - |
dc.description.abstract | For time-to-event outcomes, the Kaplan–Meier estimator is commonly used to estimate survival functions of treatment groups and to compute marginal treatment effects, such as the difference in survival rates between treatments at a landmark time. The derived estimates of the marginal treatment effect are uniformly consistent under general conditions when data are from randomized clinical trials. For data from observational studies, however, these statistical quantities are often biased due to treatment-selection bias. Propensity score-based methods estimate the survival function by adjusting for the disparity of propensity scores between treatment groups. Unfortunately, misspecification of the regression model can lead to biased estimates. Using an empirical likelihood (EL) method in which the moments of the covariate distribution of treatment groups are constrained to equality, we obtain consistent estimates of the survival functions and the marginal treatment effect. Equating moments of the covariate distribution between treatment groups simulate the covariate distribution that would have been obtained if the patients had been randomized to these treatment groups. We establish the consistency and the asymptotic limiting distribution of the proposed EL estimators. We demonstrate that the proposed estimator is robust to model misspecification. Simulation is used to study the finite sample properties of the proposed estimator. The proposed estimator is applied to a lung cancer observational study to compare two surgical procedures in treating early-stage lung cancer patients. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/10543406.asp | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics | - |
dc.rights | AOM/Preprint Before Accepted: his article has been accepted for publication in [JOURNAL TITLE], published by Taylor & Francis. AOM/Preprint After Accepted: This is an [original manuscript / preprint] of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI]. Accepted Manuscript (AM) i.e. Postprint This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in [JOURNAL TITLE] on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI]. | - |
dc.subject | Balance of covariates distribution | - |
dc.subject | Kaplan–meier curve | - |
dc.subject | marginal treatment effect | - |
dc.subject | observational study | - |
dc.subject | subsets of covariates | - |
dc.title | Bias-adjusted Kaplan–Meier survival curves for marginal treatment effect in observational studies | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Pang, H: herbpang@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Pang, H=rp01857 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/10543406.2019.1633659 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31286838 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85068700520 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 301753 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 592 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 605 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000477961800003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1054-3406 | - |