File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Subjective inflation: phenomenology’s get-rich-quick scheme

TitleSubjective inflation: phenomenology’s get-rich-quick scheme
Authors
Issue Date2019
PublisherElsevier Ltd, Current Opinion Journals. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.journals.elsevier.com/current-opinion-in-psychology
Citation
Current Opinion in Psychology, 2019, v. 29, p. 49-55 How to Cite?
AbstractHow do we explain the seemingly rich nature of visual phenomenology while accounting for impoverished perception in the periphery? This apparent mismatch has led some to posit that rich phenomenological content overflows cognitive access, whereas others hold that phenomenology is in fact sparse and constrained by cognitive access. Here, we review the Rich versus Sparse debate as it relates to a phenomenon called subjective inflation, wherein minimally attended or peripheral visual perception tends to be subjectively evaluated as more reliable than attended or foveal perception when objective performance is matched. We argue that subjective inflation can account for rich phenomenology without invoking phenomenological overflow. On this view, visual phenomenology is constrained by cognitive access, but seemingly inflated above what would be predicted based on sparse sensory content.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/276280
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.412
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKnotts, JD-
dc.contributor.authorOdegaard, B-
dc.contributor.authorLau, H-
dc.contributor.authorRosenthal, D-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-10T02:59:42Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-10T02:59:42Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationCurrent Opinion in Psychology, 2019, v. 29, p. 49-55-
dc.identifier.issn2352-250X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/276280-
dc.description.abstractHow do we explain the seemingly rich nature of visual phenomenology while accounting for impoverished perception in the periphery? This apparent mismatch has led some to posit that rich phenomenological content overflows cognitive access, whereas others hold that phenomenology is in fact sparse and constrained by cognitive access. Here, we review the Rich versus Sparse debate as it relates to a phenomenon called subjective inflation, wherein minimally attended or peripheral visual perception tends to be subjectively evaluated as more reliable than attended or foveal perception when objective performance is matched. We argue that subjective inflation can account for rich phenomenology without invoking phenomenological overflow. On this view, visual phenomenology is constrained by cognitive access, but seemingly inflated above what would be predicted based on sparse sensory content.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd, Current Opinion Journals. The Journal's web site is located at https://www.journals.elsevier.com/current-opinion-in-psychology-
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Opinion in Psychology-
dc.titleSubjective inflation: phenomenology’s get-rich-quick scheme-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLau, H: oldchild@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLau, H=rp02270-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.006-
dc.identifier.pmid30503986-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6517074-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85057324755-
dc.identifier.hkuros304567-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.spage49-
dc.identifier.epage55-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000501996000009-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl2352-250X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats