File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Individual income taxation reform in China: What is the real change?

TitleIndividual income taxation reform in China: What is the real change?
Authors
Issue Date2019
PublisherWildy, Simmonds and Hill Publishing. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wildy.com/isbn/1477-0814/journal-of-comparative-law-annual-subscription
Citation
The Journal of Comparative Law, 2019, v. 14 n. 2, p. 331-349 How to Cite?
AbstractIndividual income tax (IIT) contributes to the national fiscal revenue in China, although not in such a large portion as that in more developed jurisdictions. The year 2019 saw the most significant IIT reform in China since 1994. For the first time, itemized deductions and personalized costs are taken into account in calculating the IIT liability. The schedular system is also moving to the model of integrated income. This article first summarizes, from a theoretical perspective, why and how individual income is taxed and questions whether there exists an ideal model for the IIT. From a historical perspective, it attempts to look into the reasons that triggered the latest IIT reform and considers its appropriateness in the Chinese context. In evaluating the pros and cons of the reform, this article makes reference to experiences from other relatively more mature taxation systems including Hong Kong. While the reform may help modernize the Chinese tax system, this article concludes by calling for further reforming measures.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/277264
ISSN
SSRN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, J-
dc.contributor.authorChow, W-
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-20T08:47:44Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-20T08:47:44Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Comparative Law, 2019, v. 14 n. 2, p. 331-349-
dc.identifier.issn1477-0814-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/277264-
dc.description.abstractIndividual income tax (IIT) contributes to the national fiscal revenue in China, although not in such a large portion as that in more developed jurisdictions. The year 2019 saw the most significant IIT reform in China since 1994. For the first time, itemized deductions and personalized costs are taken into account in calculating the IIT liability. The schedular system is also moving to the model of integrated income. This article first summarizes, from a theoretical perspective, why and how individual income is taxed and questions whether there exists an ideal model for the IIT. From a historical perspective, it attempts to look into the reasons that triggered the latest IIT reform and considers its appropriateness in the Chinese context. In evaluating the pros and cons of the reform, this article makes reference to experiences from other relatively more mature taxation systems including Hong Kong. While the reform may help modernize the Chinese tax system, this article concludes by calling for further reforming measures.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWildy, Simmonds and Hill Publishing. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wildy.com/isbn/1477-0814/journal-of-comparative-law-annual-subscription -
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Comparative Law-
dc.titleIndividual income taxation reform in China: What is the real change?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChow, W: wschow@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChow, W=rp01282-
dc.identifier.hkuros305960-
dc.identifier.volume14-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage331-
dc.identifier.epage349-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.ssrn3442731-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2019/044-
dc.identifier.issnl1477-0814-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats