File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Variability of cement mantle thickness in total knee arthroplasty
Title | Variability of cement mantle thickness in total knee arthroplasty |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Publisher | Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association. |
Citation | Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA) 38th Annual Congress, Hong Kong, 3-4 November 2018, p. 54 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Introduction: The optimal thickness of the cement mantle in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been proposed to be 3-5mm for implant stability. However, there is a paucity of studies on the capacity to obtain a constant cement mantle thickness in practice. The aim of this study was to assess whether there is a difference in the cement mantle thickness in TKA performed between different surgeons.
Methodology: The 20 most recent primary TKA performed by each surgeon were selected to make up a total of 100 patients. There is varying cementing techniques between the surgeons. For all surgeons, pulsatile lavage and cement vacuum mixing was used. Some surgeons used a technique of finger packing to pressurise the intramedullary cavity before insertion of the implant. One surgeon did not use a tourniquet. Initial postoperative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were assessed to measure the cement penetration according to zones proposed by the Knee Society.
Results and Analysis: Between the surgeons, there were no difference in the cement thickness at the tibial tray (p>0.05), but there was a difference around the tibial stem (p<0.05). Particularly, a surgeon using a finger pressurisation technique produced a significantly thicker mantle around the stem (mean lateral 6.1mm; AP 5.1mm) compared to 2 other surgeons who didn’t use this technique (mean lateral 3.5mm, 3.6mm; AP: 3.6mm, 3.2mm).
Discussion and Conclusion: Between the joint surgeons in our centre, there was no difference in cement thickness at the tibial tray, but there was a difference around the tibial stem, which may be affected by the cementing technique. |
Description | Free Paper Session I: Adult Joint Reconstruction I - no. 1.10 |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/277831 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Luk, MH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chiu, PKY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, PK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fu, CHH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, MHS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, YLA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yan, CH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-04T08:02:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-04T08:02:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA) 38th Annual Congress, Hong Kong, 3-4 November 2018, p. 54 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/277831 | - |
dc.description | Free Paper Session I: Adult Joint Reconstruction I - no. 1.10 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The optimal thickness of the cement mantle in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been proposed to be 3-5mm for implant stability. However, there is a paucity of studies on the capacity to obtain a constant cement mantle thickness in practice. The aim of this study was to assess whether there is a difference in the cement mantle thickness in TKA performed between different surgeons. Methodology: The 20 most recent primary TKA performed by each surgeon were selected to make up a total of 100 patients. There is varying cementing techniques between the surgeons. For all surgeons, pulsatile lavage and cement vacuum mixing was used. Some surgeons used a technique of finger packing to pressurise the intramedullary cavity before insertion of the implant. One surgeon did not use a tourniquet. Initial postoperative anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs were assessed to measure the cement penetration according to zones proposed by the Knee Society. Results and Analysis: Between the surgeons, there were no difference in the cement thickness at the tibial tray (p>0.05), but there was a difference around the tibial stem (p<0.05). Particularly, a surgeon using a finger pressurisation technique produced a significantly thicker mantle around the stem (mean lateral 6.1mm; AP 5.1mm) compared to 2 other surgeons who didn’t use this technique (mean lateral 3.5mm, 3.6mm; AP: 3.6mm, 3.2mm). Discussion and Conclusion: Between the joint surgeons in our centre, there was no difference in cement thickness at the tibial tray, but there was a difference around the tibial stem, which may be affected by the cementing technique. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | 38th Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association Annual Congress, 2018 | - |
dc.rights | 38th Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association Annual Congress, 2018. Copyright © Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association. | - |
dc.title | Variability of cement mantle thickness in total knee arthroplasty | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
dc.identifier.email | Luk, MH: lukhilda@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chiu, PKY: pkychiu@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chan, PK: cpk464@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Fu, CHH: drhfu@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Cheung, MHS: steveort@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Cheung, YLA: amyorth@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Yan, CH: yanchoi@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Chiu, PKY=rp00379 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Cheung, MHS=rp02253 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Yan, CH=rp00303 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 307089 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 54 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 54 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Hong Kong | - |