File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Tracking job and housing dynamics with smartcard data

TitleTracking job and housing dynamics with smartcard data
Authors
Keywordscommuting pattern
job dynamics
housing dynamics
mobility group
smartcard data
Issue Date2018
PublisherNational Academy of Sciences. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pnas.org
Citation
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, v. 115 n. 50, p. 12710-12715 How to Cite?
AbstractResidential locations, the jobs–housing relationship, and commuting patterns are key elements to understand urban spatial structure and how city dwellers live. Their successive interaction is important for various fields including urban planning, transport, intraurban migration studies, and social science. However, understanding of the long-term trajectories of workplace and home location, and the resulting commuting patterns, is still limited due to lack of year-to-year data tracking individual behavior. With a 7-y transit smartcard dataset, this paper traces individual trajectories of residences and workplaces. Based on in-metro travel times before and after job and/or home moves, we find that 45 min is an inflection point where the behavioral preference changes. Commuters whose travel time exceeds the point prefer to shorten commutes via moves, while others with shorter commutes tend to increase travel time for better jobs and/or residences. Moreover, we capture four mobility groups: home mover, job hopper, job-and-residence switcher, and stayer. This paper studies how these groups trade off travel time and housing expenditure with their job and housing patterns. Stayers with high job and housing stability tend to be home (apartment unit) owners subject to middle- to high-income groups. Home movers work at places similar to stayers, while they may upgrade from tenancy to ownership. Switchers increase commute time as well as housing expenditure via job and home moves, as they pay for better residences and work farther from home. Job hoppers mainly reside in the suburbs, suffer from long commutes, change jobs frequently, and are likely to be low-income migrants.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/278828
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 9.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.737
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuang, J-
dc.contributor.authorLevinson, D-
dc.contributor.authorWang, J-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, J-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Z-J-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T02:14:46Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-21T02:14:46Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, v. 115 n. 50, p. 12710-12715-
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/278828-
dc.description.abstractResidential locations, the jobs–housing relationship, and commuting patterns are key elements to understand urban spatial structure and how city dwellers live. Their successive interaction is important for various fields including urban planning, transport, intraurban migration studies, and social science. However, understanding of the long-term trajectories of workplace and home location, and the resulting commuting patterns, is still limited due to lack of year-to-year data tracking individual behavior. With a 7-y transit smartcard dataset, this paper traces individual trajectories of residences and workplaces. Based on in-metro travel times before and after job and/or home moves, we find that 45 min is an inflection point where the behavioral preference changes. Commuters whose travel time exceeds the point prefer to shorten commutes via moves, while others with shorter commutes tend to increase travel time for better jobs and/or residences. Moreover, we capture four mobility groups: home mover, job hopper, job-and-residence switcher, and stayer. This paper studies how these groups trade off travel time and housing expenditure with their job and housing patterns. Stayers with high job and housing stability tend to be home (apartment unit) owners subject to middle- to high-income groups. Home movers work at places similar to stayers, while they may upgrade from tenancy to ownership. Switchers increase commute time as well as housing expenditure via job and home moves, as they pay for better residences and work farther from home. Job hoppers mainly reside in the suburbs, suffer from long commutes, change jobs frequently, and are likely to be low-income migrants.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherNational Academy of Sciences. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pnas.org-
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences-
dc.rightsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences.-
dc.subjectcommuting pattern-
dc.subjectjob dynamics-
dc.subjecthousing dynamics-
dc.subjectmobility group-
dc.subjectsmartcard data-
dc.titleTracking job and housing dynamics with smartcard data-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailZhou, J: zhoujp@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityZhou, J=rp02236-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.1815928115-
dc.identifier.pmid30455293-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC6294921-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85058326128-
dc.identifier.hkuros307752-
dc.identifier.volume115-
dc.identifier.issue50-
dc.identifier.spage12710-
dc.identifier.epage12715-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000452866000065-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0027-8424-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats