File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Model Specification and collateralized Debt Obligation (Mis)pricing

TitleModel Specification and collateralized Debt Obligation (Mis)pricing
Authors
KeywordsCDO
default correlation
frailty
model specification
Issue Date2018
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/
Citation
The Journal of Futures Markets, 2018, v. 38 n. 11, p. 1284-1312 How to Cite?
AbstractComplex structured products, especially collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), were at the center of the 2008 credit crisis. This paper explores the impact of modeling difficulties on CDO mispricing. Comparing pricing outputs among models with different specifications, we show that the use of a model with advanced default correlation assumptions could have reduced the amount of model‐implied AAA‐rated CDO securities. This pricing difference also has predictive power for the subsequent downgrading of AAA‐rated CDO tranches. However, the model specification is only qualitatively important for CDO mispricing, as it has a modest quantitative effect in explaining the overall pricing errors.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/278924
ISSN
2022 Impact Factor: 1.9
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.880
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLuo, D-
dc.contributor.authorTang, DY-
dc.contributor.authorWang, SQ-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T02:16:26Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-21T02:16:26Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of Futures Markets, 2018, v. 38 n. 11, p. 1284-1312-
dc.identifier.issn0270-7314-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/278924-
dc.description.abstractComplex structured products, especially collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), were at the center of the 2008 credit crisis. This paper explores the impact of modeling difficulties on CDO mispricing. Comparing pricing outputs among models with different specifications, we show that the use of a model with advanced default correlation assumptions could have reduced the amount of model‐implied AAA‐rated CDO securities. This pricing difference also has predictive power for the subsequent downgrading of AAA‐rated CDO tranches. However, the model specification is only qualitatively important for CDO mispricing, as it has a modest quantitative effect in explaining the overall pricing errors.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0270-7314/-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Futures Markets-
dc.rightsPreprint This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. Postprint This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [FULL CITE], which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.subjectCDO-
dc.subjectdefault correlation-
dc.subjectfrailty-
dc.subjectmodel specification-
dc.titleModel Specification and collateralized Debt Obligation (Mis)pricing-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailTang, DY: yjtang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityTang, DY=rp01096-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/fut.21932-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85050397862-
dc.identifier.hkuros308113-
dc.identifier.volume38-
dc.identifier.issue11-
dc.identifier.spage1284-
dc.identifier.epage1312-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000447149800001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0270-7314-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats