File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1038/s41534-019-0201-8
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85073516267
- WOS: WOS:000489957900002
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: When does reinforcement learning stand out in quantum control? A comparative study on state preparation
Title | When does reinforcement learning stand out in quantum control? A comparative study on state preparation |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Machine learning Learning Restricted Boltzmann |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | Nature Research (part of Springer Nature): Fully open access journals. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nature.com/npjqi/ |
Citation | npj Quantum Information, 2019, v. 5, p. article no. 85 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Reinforcement learning has been widely used in many problems, including quantum control of qubits. However, such problems can, at the same time, be solved by traditional, non-machine-learning methods, such as stochastic gradient descent and Krotov algorithms, and it remains unclear which one is most suitable when the control has specific constraints. In this work, we perform a comparative study on the efficacy of three reinforcement learning algorithms: tabular Q-learning, deep Q-learning, and policy gradient, as well as two non-machine-learning methods: stochastic gradient descent and Krotov algorithms, in the problem of preparing a desired quantum state. We found that overall, the deep Q-learning and policy gradient algorithms outperform others when the problem is discretized, e.g. allowing discrete values of control, and when the problem scales up. The reinforcement learning algorithms can also adaptively reduce the complexity of the control sequences, shortening the operation time and improving the fidelity. Our comparison provides insights into the suitability of reinforcement learning in quantum control problems. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/279478 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.824 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, XM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wei, Z | - |
dc.contributor.author | Asad, R | - |
dc.contributor.author | YANG, XC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, X | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-01T07:18:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-01T07:18:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | npj Quantum Information, 2019, v. 5, p. article no. 85 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2056-6387 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/279478 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Reinforcement learning has been widely used in many problems, including quantum control of qubits. However, such problems can, at the same time, be solved by traditional, non-machine-learning methods, such as stochastic gradient descent and Krotov algorithms, and it remains unclear which one is most suitable when the control has specific constraints. In this work, we perform a comparative study on the efficacy of three reinforcement learning algorithms: tabular Q-learning, deep Q-learning, and policy gradient, as well as two non-machine-learning methods: stochastic gradient descent and Krotov algorithms, in the problem of preparing a desired quantum state. We found that overall, the deep Q-learning and policy gradient algorithms outperform others when the problem is discretized, e.g. allowing discrete values of control, and when the problem scales up. The reinforcement learning algorithms can also adaptively reduce the complexity of the control sequences, shortening the operation time and improving the fidelity. Our comparison provides insights into the suitability of reinforcement learning in quantum control problems. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Nature Research (part of Springer Nature): Fully open access journals. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.nature.com/npjqi/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | npj Quantum Information | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Machine learning | - |
dc.subject | Learning | - |
dc.subject | Restricted Boltzmann | - |
dc.title | When does reinforcement learning stand out in quantum control? A comparative study on state preparation | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41534-019-0201-8 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85073516267 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 308514 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 5 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 85 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 85 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000489957900002 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2056-6387 | - |