File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/brb3.1468
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85075250767
- PMID: 31747124
- WOS: WOS:000497237300001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Remediating reduced memory specificity in bipolar disorder: A case study using a Computerized Memory Specificity Training
Title | Remediating reduced memory specificity in bipolar disorder: A case study using a Computerized Memory Specificity Training |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | autobiographical memory bipolar disorder Memory Specificity Training reduced autobiographical memory specificity |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2157-9032 |
Citation | Brain and Behavior, 2019, v. 9 n. 12, p. article no. e01468 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives:
Reduced autobiographical memory specificity (rAMS) is a vulnerability factor found across unipolar depression (UD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), eating disorder, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder (BD). A group delivered psychological therapy training called Memory Specificity Training (MeST) remediates rAMS in UD and PTSD, with additional downstream effects on related psychological processes and symptoms. Its impact in BD is unknown. In this case study, we examined the impact of a computerized version of MeST (c‐MeST) on improving AMS and related symptoms and processes in participant with rapid cycling type I BD.
Method:
An experimental case study with an ABA design was used. During baseline (14 days, Phase A), the training phase (nine sessions across 17 days, Phase B), and a 1‐month follow‐up (Phase A), memory specificity, depressive symptoms, and related processes and symptoms were repeatedly measured.
Results:
Memory specificity increased significantly after the participant completed c‐MeST. Session‐to‐session scores indicated that AMS improved most from the in‐person baseline assessment to the first online session. All other measures of processes and symptoms deteriorated during the training phase but regressed to baseline during follow‐up.
Conclusion:
Memory specificity was improved as indicated by increased AMS from pre‐intervention measurement to 1‐month follow‐up. Other improvements in symptoms were not observed. Rather, some related maladaptive psychological processes and symptoms worsened during the training phase and regressed to baseline during follow‐up. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/280257 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.908 |
PubMed Central ID | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Martens, K | - |
dc.contributor.author | Takano, K | - |
dc.contributor.author | Barry, TJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Holmes, EA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wyckaert, S | - |
dc.contributor.author | Raes, F | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-21T11:50:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-21T11:50:51Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Brain and Behavior, 2019, v. 9 n. 12, p. article no. e01468 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2162-3279 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/280257 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: Reduced autobiographical memory specificity (rAMS) is a vulnerability factor found across unipolar depression (UD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), eating disorder, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder (BD). A group delivered psychological therapy training called Memory Specificity Training (MeST) remediates rAMS in UD and PTSD, with additional downstream effects on related psychological processes and symptoms. Its impact in BD is unknown. In this case study, we examined the impact of a computerized version of MeST (c‐MeST) on improving AMS and related symptoms and processes in participant with rapid cycling type I BD. Method: An experimental case study with an ABA design was used. During baseline (14 days, Phase A), the training phase (nine sessions across 17 days, Phase B), and a 1‐month follow‐up (Phase A), memory specificity, depressive symptoms, and related processes and symptoms were repeatedly measured. Results: Memory specificity increased significantly after the participant completed c‐MeST. Session‐to‐session scores indicated that AMS improved most from the in‐person baseline assessment to the first online session. All other measures of processes and symptoms deteriorated during the training phase but regressed to baseline during follow‐up. Conclusion: Memory specificity was improved as indicated by increased AMS from pre‐intervention measurement to 1‐month follow‐up. Other improvements in symptoms were not observed. Rather, some related maladaptive psychological processes and symptoms worsened during the training phase and regressed to baseline during follow‐up. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2157-9032 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Brain and Behavior | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | autobiographical memory | - |
dc.subject | bipolar disorder | - |
dc.subject | Memory Specificity Training | - |
dc.subject | reduced autobiographical memory specificity | - |
dc.title | Remediating reduced memory specificity in bipolar disorder: A case study using a Computerized Memory Specificity Training | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Barry, TJ: tjbarry@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Barry, TJ=rp02277 | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/brb3.1468 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31747124 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC6908894 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85075250767 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 309009 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 9 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 12 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. e01468 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. e01468 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000497237300001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 2162-3279 | - |