File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1177/0310057X9702500203
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0030934523
- PMID: 9127653
- WOS: WOS:A1997WU26200003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using pethidine or fentanyl
Title | Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using pethidine or fentanyl |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Analgesia: patient-controlled analgesia Analgesics: pethidine, fentanyl Anaesthesia: epidural, caesarean |
Issue Date | 1997 |
Citation | Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1997, v. 25, n. 2, p. 126-132 How to Cite? |
Abstract | We compared patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) using pethidine or fentanyl in a randomized, double-blind crossover study of 80 patients after caesarean section. Patients received pethidine by PCEA or PCIA, or fentanyl by PCEA or PCIA, with a crossover of the route of administration at 12 h. For pethidine, pain scores were lower with PCEA vs PCIA from 4 to 16 h (P < 0.05). Pethidine consumption was lower with PCEA vs PCIA from 12 to 24 h (P = 0.0005). Patients preferred PCEA to PCIA (P = 0.015). For fentanyl, pain scores were lower with PCEA vs PCIA at 12 h (P = 0.045). Fentanyl consumption was lower with PCEA vs PCIA from 0 to 12 h (P = 0.0007). Patients had similar preference for PCEA and PCIA. Pain scores and side-effects were similar between drugs. Plasma pethidine was similar between groups. Plasma fentanyl was higher with PCIA vs PCEA at 12 h (P = 0.002). PCEA has advantages over PCIA and pethidine may be the preferred drug. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/280457 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.534 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ngan Kee, W. D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, K. K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chen, P. P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gin, T. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-17T14:34:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-17T14:34:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1997, v. 25, n. 2, p. 126-132 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0310-057X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/280457 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We compared patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) using pethidine or fentanyl in a randomized, double-blind crossover study of 80 patients after caesarean section. Patients received pethidine by PCEA or PCIA, or fentanyl by PCEA or PCIA, with a crossover of the route of administration at 12 h. For pethidine, pain scores were lower with PCEA vs PCIA from 4 to 16 h (P < 0.05). Pethidine consumption was lower with PCEA vs PCIA from 12 to 24 h (P = 0.0005). Patients preferred PCEA to PCIA (P = 0.015). For fentanyl, pain scores were lower with PCEA vs PCIA at 12 h (P = 0.045). Fentanyl consumption was lower with PCEA vs PCIA from 0 to 12 h (P = 0.0007). Patients had similar preference for PCEA and PCIA. Pain scores and side-effects were similar between drugs. Plasma pethidine was similar between groups. Plasma fentanyl was higher with PCIA vs PCEA at 12 h (P = 0.002). PCEA has advantages over PCIA and pethidine may be the preferred drug. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Anaesthesia and Intensive Care | - |
dc.subject | Analgesia: patient-controlled analgesia | - |
dc.subject | Analgesics: pethidine, fentanyl | - |
dc.subject | Anaesthesia: epidural, caesarean | - |
dc.title | Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using pethidine or fentanyl | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0310057X9702500203 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 9127653 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0030934523 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 25 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 126 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 132 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:A1997WU26200003 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0310-057X | - |