File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2001.1962-4.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0034754944
- PMID: 11703246
- WOS: WOS:000172147700014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Patient-controlled pethidine after major upper abdominal surgery: Comparison of the epidural and intravenous routes
Title | Patient-controlled pethidine after major upper abdominal surgery: Comparison of the epidural and intravenous routes |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Pain: postoperative Analgesics: pethidine Analgesia: patient-controlled analgesia |
Issue Date | 2001 |
Citation | Anaesthesia, 2001, v. 56, n. 11, p. 1106-1112 How to Cite? |
Abstract | We compared epidural (n = 17) and intravenous (n = 20) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using pethidine (bolus 10 mg, lockout interval 10 min, 4-h maximum dose 3 mg.kg-1) after total gastrectomy. We found that mean (SD) pethidine consumption in the first 24 h was 33% less in the epidural group [255 (85) mg] than in the intravenous group [379 (129) mg, p = 0.002], although most of this difference occurred in the first 8 h. Plasma concentrations of pethidine were lower at 8 h (p < 0.01) in the epidural group, but were similar at 24 h. Pain scores, side-effects, patient satisfaction and patient outcome were similar between groups. Epidural and intravenous pethidine PCA provided similar efficacy after major abdominal surgery, although the epidural route can reduce the amount of pethidine used initially. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/280509 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 7.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.400 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chen, P. P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheam, E. W. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ma, M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, K. K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ngan Kee, W. D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gin, T. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-02-17T14:34:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-02-17T14:34:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Anaesthesia, 2001, v. 56, n. 11, p. 1106-1112 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0003-2409 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/280509 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We compared epidural (n = 17) and intravenous (n = 20) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) using pethidine (bolus 10 mg, lockout interval 10 min, 4-h maximum dose 3 mg.kg-1) after total gastrectomy. We found that mean (SD) pethidine consumption in the first 24 h was 33% less in the epidural group [255 (85) mg] than in the intravenous group [379 (129) mg, p = 0.002], although most of this difference occurred in the first 8 h. Plasma concentrations of pethidine were lower at 8 h (p < 0.01) in the epidural group, but were similar at 24 h. Pain scores, side-effects, patient satisfaction and patient outcome were similar between groups. Epidural and intravenous pethidine PCA provided similar efficacy after major abdominal surgery, although the epidural route can reduce the amount of pethidine used initially. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Anaesthesia | - |
dc.subject | Pain: postoperative | - |
dc.subject | Analgesics: pethidine | - |
dc.subject | Analgesia: patient-controlled analgesia | - |
dc.title | Patient-controlled pethidine after major upper abdominal surgery: Comparison of the epidural and intravenous routes | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2001.1962-4.x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 11703246 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0034754944 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 56 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 11 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1106 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 1112 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000172147700014 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0003-2409 | - |