File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.2147/OPTH.S228910
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85078660745
- WOS: WOS:000511135300001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Effectiveness and Safety of Long Duration versus Short Duration Diode Laser Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation
Title | Effectiveness and Safety of Long Duration versus Short Duration Diode Laser Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | cyclodiode cycloablation cyclodestruction cyclodestructive g-probe |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | Dove Medical Press Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.dovepress.com/articles.php?journal_id=9 |
Citation | Clinical Ophthalmology, 2020, v. 2000 n. 14, p. 197-204 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation using either the long duration or short duration protocol. Methods: Retrospective series of 23 consecutive patients with glaucoma who underwent continuous-wave diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation from August 2016 to July 2018 at a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong. Laser pulse duration for the long and short duration protocols was defined as 3.0-4.0 and 1.5-2.0 s, respectively. Results: There were 15 male and 8 female Chinese subjects (23 eyes), age 49-90 (71.3 +/- 2.7), with 10 subjects that underwent long duration cyclophotocoagulation (power 1239.2 +/- 78.3 mW, spots 13.9 +/- 1.4) and 13 subjects that had short duration cyclophotocoagulation (mean power 1817.3 +/- 85.7 mW, spots 14.4 +/- 1.0). Six months after long and short duration cyclophotocoagulation, intraocular pressure decreased significantly from 29.9 +/- 7.8 to 21.1 +/- 6.5 (p < 0.01), and from 35.4 +/- 2.7 to 24.1 +/- 3.4 (p = 0.04), respectively, while glaucoma medications decreased significantly by 1.4 +/- 0.5 (p = 0.02) in the long duration group only. Reduction of medications after short duration cyclophotocoagulation was less and did not reach statistical significance (0.9 +/- 0.9, p = 0.15). There was no significant difference of visual deterioration and complication rates. Conclusion: Both types of cyclophotocoagulation were equally effective in lowering intraocular pressure by 6 months, but the short duration protocol, using higher laser power, was able to achieve a greater and earlier reduction, at 3 months. However, the long duration protocol, using less laser power, appears better at reducing medication requirement by 6 months. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/281918 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.911 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chan, JC-H | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chow, SC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lai, JS-M | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-03T07:23:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-03T07:23:37Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Ophthalmology, 2020, v. 2000 n. 14, p. 197-204 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1177-5467 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/281918 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation using either the long duration or short duration protocol. Methods: Retrospective series of 23 consecutive patients with glaucoma who underwent continuous-wave diode laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation from August 2016 to July 2018 at a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong. Laser pulse duration for the long and short duration protocols was defined as 3.0-4.0 and 1.5-2.0 s, respectively. Results: There were 15 male and 8 female Chinese subjects (23 eyes), age 49-90 (71.3 +/- 2.7), with 10 subjects that underwent long duration cyclophotocoagulation (power 1239.2 +/- 78.3 mW, spots 13.9 +/- 1.4) and 13 subjects that had short duration cyclophotocoagulation (mean power 1817.3 +/- 85.7 mW, spots 14.4 +/- 1.0). Six months after long and short duration cyclophotocoagulation, intraocular pressure decreased significantly from 29.9 +/- 7.8 to 21.1 +/- 6.5 (p < 0.01), and from 35.4 +/- 2.7 to 24.1 +/- 3.4 (p = 0.04), respectively, while glaucoma medications decreased significantly by 1.4 +/- 0.5 (p = 0.02) in the long duration group only. Reduction of medications after short duration cyclophotocoagulation was less and did not reach statistical significance (0.9 +/- 0.9, p = 0.15). There was no significant difference of visual deterioration and complication rates. Conclusion: Both types of cyclophotocoagulation were equally effective in lowering intraocular pressure by 6 months, but the short duration protocol, using higher laser power, was able to achieve a greater and earlier reduction, at 3 months. However, the long duration protocol, using less laser power, appears better at reducing medication requirement by 6 months. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Dove Medical Press Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.dovepress.com/articles.php?journal_id=9 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Ophthalmology | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | cyclodiode | - |
dc.subject | cycloablation | - |
dc.subject | cyclodestruction | - |
dc.subject | cyclodestructive | - |
dc.subject | g-probe | - |
dc.title | Effectiveness and Safety of Long Duration versus Short Duration Diode Laser Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chan, JC-H: jonochan@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lai, JS-M: laism@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Chan, JC-H=rp02113 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lai, JS-M=rp00295 | - |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2147/OPTH.S228910 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85078660745 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 309597 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 2000 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 14 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 197 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 204 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000511135300001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | New Zealand | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1177-5467 | - |