File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.066
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85089729777
- PMID: 32376335
- WOS: WOS:000600548600027
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: New insights on missed colonic lesions during colonoscopy through artificial intelligence-assisted real-time detection (with video)
Title | New insights on missed colonic lesions during colonoscopy through artificial intelligence-assisted real-time detection (with video) |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | Mosby, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/gie |
Citation | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2020, v. 93 n. 1, p. 193-200.E1 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background and Aims:
Recent meta-analysis showed that up to 26% of adenoma could be missed during colonoscopy. We investigated whether the use of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted real-time detection could provide new insights into mechanisms underlying missed lesions during colonoscopy.
Methods:
A validated real-time deep learning AI model for detection of colonic polyps was first tested in the videos of tandem colonoscopy of the proximal colon for missed lesions. The real-time AI model was then prospectively validated in total colonoscopy in which endoscopist was blinded to the real-time AI findings. Segmental unblinding of the AI findings were provided and that colonic segment would be re-examined when there were missed lesions detected by AI but not the endoscopist. All polyps were removed for histological examination as the criterion standard.
Results:
Sixty-five videos of tandem examination of the proximal colon were reviewed by AI. AI could detect 79.1% (19/24) of missed proximal adenoma in the video of the first-pass examination. In the 52 prospective colonoscopies, real-time AI detection could detect at least one missed adenoma in 14 (26.9%) patients and increased total number of adenomas detected by 23.6%. Multivariable analysis showed that missed adenoma(s) was more likely when there were multiple polyps (adjusted OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09; p < 0.0001) or colonoscopy by less experienced endoscopists (adjusted OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.05-1.62; p=0.02).
Conclusion:
Our findings provide new insights on the prominent role of human factors, including inexperience and distraction, play on missed colonic lesions. With the use of real-time AI assistance, up to 80% of missed adenoma could be prevented. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/282529 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.749 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lui, TKL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Hui, CKY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tsui, VWM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, KS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ko, MKL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Foo, ACC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Mak, LY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yeung, CK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lui, THW | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, SY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, WK | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-15T05:29:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-15T05:29:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2020, v. 93 n. 1, p. 193-200.E1 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0016-5107 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/282529 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background and Aims: Recent meta-analysis showed that up to 26% of adenoma could be missed during colonoscopy. We investigated whether the use of artificial intelligence (AI) assisted real-time detection could provide new insights into mechanisms underlying missed lesions during colonoscopy. Methods: A validated real-time deep learning AI model for detection of colonic polyps was first tested in the videos of tandem colonoscopy of the proximal colon for missed lesions. The real-time AI model was then prospectively validated in total colonoscopy in which endoscopist was blinded to the real-time AI findings. Segmental unblinding of the AI findings were provided and that colonic segment would be re-examined when there were missed lesions detected by AI but not the endoscopist. All polyps were removed for histological examination as the criterion standard. Results: Sixty-five videos of tandem examination of the proximal colon were reviewed by AI. AI could detect 79.1% (19/24) of missed proximal adenoma in the video of the first-pass examination. In the 52 prospective colonoscopies, real-time AI detection could detect at least one missed adenoma in 14 (26.9%) patients and increased total number of adenomas detected by 23.6%. Multivariable analysis showed that missed adenoma(s) was more likely when there were multiple polyps (adjusted OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09; p < 0.0001) or colonoscopy by less experienced endoscopists (adjusted OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.05-1.62; p=0.02). Conclusion: Our findings provide new insights on the prominent role of human factors, including inexperience and distraction, play on missed colonic lesions. With the use of real-time AI assistance, up to 80% of missed adenoma could be prevented. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Mosby, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/gie | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Gastrointestinal Endoscopy | - |
dc.title | New insights on missed colonic lesions during colonoscopy through artificial intelligence-assisted real-time detection (with video) | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lui, TKL: lkl484@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Cheung, KS: cks634@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Foo, ACC: ccfoo@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Mak, LY: lungyi@HKUCC-COM.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Wong, SY: ksywong@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Cheung, KS=rp02532 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Foo, ACC=rp01899 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Mak, LY=rp02668 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.066 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32376335 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85089729777 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 309946 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 93 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 193 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 200.E1 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000600548600027 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0016-5107 | - |