File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Interim Results of a Multicentre Cohort Using a Fenestrated Spiral Blade Cephalomedullary Device with or without Cementation

TitleInterim Results of a Multicentre Cohort Using a Fenestrated Spiral Blade Cephalomedullary Device with or without Cementation
Authors
Issue Date2019
PublisherHong Kong Orthopaedic Association.
Citation
The 39th Annual Congress of the Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association: Rebuild and Rebrighten aging population to the next century, Hong Kong, 2-3 November 2019 How to Cite?
AbstractIntroduction: Newer-generation proximal femoral nail allows cement augmentation to enhance bone anchorage. Our study investigated whether cement augmentation in the TFN-Advanced Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) reduces the rate of cut-out/cut-through and excessive blade sliding. Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study conducted between September 2015 and March 2019. Inclusion criteria were pertrochanteric fracture (AO/OTA classification type 31 A1, A2, A3), age ≥50 years, low energy trauma, and treated with TFNA. Primary outcomes were the rates of implant cut-out, cut-through, and mortality. Secondary outcome was the degree of fracture collapse represented by blade sliding on X-ray. Confounding factors such as patient demographics, fracture characteristics, fracture reduction quality, and fixation quality were accounted for. Results: In all, 75 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 41 patients in the cement augmented (CA) group and 34 patients in the non-cement augmented (NCA) group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and reduction quality. There were more posteriorly positioned blades in the NCA group (20.6% vs 4.9%; p=0.039). There was a lower rate of cut-out or cut-through (11.8% vs 0%; p=0.026) and less fracture collapse in the CA group (3.6 mm vs 2.0 mm; p=0.029). Conclusion: There was a lower rate of cut-out or cut-through and less fracture collapse in the CA group.
DescriptionFree Paper Session I: Trauma - no. FP1.10
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/283303

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYee, KH-
dc.contributor.authorLau, WH-
dc.contributor.authorFang, CX-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, FKL-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-22T02:54:46Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-22T02:54:46Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationThe 39th Annual Congress of the Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association: Rebuild and Rebrighten aging population to the next century, Hong Kong, 2-3 November 2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/283303-
dc.descriptionFree Paper Session I: Trauma - no. FP1.10-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Newer-generation proximal femoral nail allows cement augmentation to enhance bone anchorage. Our study investigated whether cement augmentation in the TFN-Advanced Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) reduces the rate of cut-out/cut-through and excessive blade sliding. Methods: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study conducted between September 2015 and March 2019. Inclusion criteria were pertrochanteric fracture (AO/OTA classification type 31 A1, A2, A3), age ≥50 years, low energy trauma, and treated with TFNA. Primary outcomes were the rates of implant cut-out, cut-through, and mortality. Secondary outcome was the degree of fracture collapse represented by blade sliding on X-ray. Confounding factors such as patient demographics, fracture characteristics, fracture reduction quality, and fixation quality were accounted for. Results: In all, 75 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 41 patients in the cement augmented (CA) group and 34 patients in the non-cement augmented (NCA) group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in patient demographics, fracture characteristics, and reduction quality. There were more posteriorly positioned blades in the NCA group (20.6% vs 4.9%; p=0.039). There was a lower rate of cut-out or cut-through (11.8% vs 0%; p=0.026) and less fracture collapse in the CA group (3.6 mm vs 2.0 mm; p=0.029). Conclusion: There was a lower rate of cut-out or cut-through and less fracture collapse in the CA group.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherHong Kong Orthopaedic Association.-
dc.relation.ispartof39th Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA) Annual Congress, 2019-
dc.rights39th Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA) Annual Congress, 2019. Copyright © Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association.-
dc.titleInterim Results of a Multicentre Cohort Using a Fenestrated Spiral Blade Cephalomedullary Device with or without Cementation-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailYee, KH: yeedns@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailFang, CX: cfang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLeung, FKL: klleunga@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityFang, CX=rp02016-
dc.identifier.authorityLeung, FKL=rp00297-
dc.identifier.hkuros310642-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats