File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Improved Glenoid Component Screw Placement for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty by Surgeon Designed Patient-specific Instrumentation versus Conventional Method : A Comparative Study
Title | Improved Glenoid Component Screw Placement for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty by Surgeon Designed Patient-specific Instrumentation versus Conventional Method : A Comparative Study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2019 |
Publisher | Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association. |
Citation | The 39th Annual Congress of the Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association: Rebuild and Rebrighten aging population to the next century, Hong Kong, 2-3 November 2019 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Introduction: Glenoid component fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is critical to prevent loosening. Long angle stable screws in the superior and inferior glenoid bone is the preferred method. However, this can be technically challenging especially in patients with smaller glenoid dimensions. Here, we assess the efficacy of a surgeon-designed three dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in enhancing the accuracy of screw placement compared with conventional instrumentation.
Methods: Multicentre retrospective comparative study of RSA was performed using conventional instrumentation against a surgeon designed, in-house produced 3D-printed PSI jigs for glenoid guide pin orientation and superior-inferior screw placement. The outcome measurements were screw length attainable for superior and inferior screw placement, operating time, and complications.
Results: Twenty-nine RSAs were performed with 11 using PSI and 18 with conventional instrumentation. Average anteroposterior glenoid diameter was 27.1 mm (range, 24.9-29.2 mm) in the conventional group and 23.6 mm (range, 21.6-29.3 mm) in the PSI group. Superior and inferior screw lengths were significantly longer by a mean of 7.70 mm and 10.58 mm, respectively in the PSI group compared with conventional group (p=0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.13-14.3; p=0.01, 95% CI=3.34-17.8). The mean superior screw lengths were 46.2 mm (range, 36-48 mm) and 38.5 mm (range, 20-48 mm) for PSI and conventional instrumentation, respectively, while the mean inferior screw lengths were 46.2 mm (range, 36-48 mm) in PSI and 35.6 mm (range, 20-48 mm) in conventional instrumentation.
Conclusion: Significantly longer screws were placed using PSI. Long screws were reliably placed even in small glenoids with anteroposterior diameter of <25 mm. Routine use of PSI can improve placement of screws in RSA. |
Description | Free Paper Session I: Trauma - no. FP1.12 |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/283305 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yung, CS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, KKH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Siu, YC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Poon, KC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, FKL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fang, CX | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-22T02:54:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-22T02:54:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The 39th Annual Congress of the Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association: Rebuild and Rebrighten aging population to the next century, Hong Kong, 2-3 November 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/283305 | - |
dc.description | Free Paper Session I: Trauma - no. FP1.12 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: Glenoid component fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is critical to prevent loosening. Long angle stable screws in the superior and inferior glenoid bone is the preferred method. However, this can be technically challenging especially in patients with smaller glenoid dimensions. Here, we assess the efficacy of a surgeon-designed three dimensional (3D)-printed patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) in enhancing the accuracy of screw placement compared with conventional instrumentation. Methods: Multicentre retrospective comparative study of RSA was performed using conventional instrumentation against a surgeon designed, in-house produced 3D-printed PSI jigs for glenoid guide pin orientation and superior-inferior screw placement. The outcome measurements were screw length attainable for superior and inferior screw placement, operating time, and complications. Results: Twenty-nine RSAs were performed with 11 using PSI and 18 with conventional instrumentation. Average anteroposterior glenoid diameter was 27.1 mm (range, 24.9-29.2 mm) in the conventional group and 23.6 mm (range, 21.6-29.3 mm) in the PSI group. Superior and inferior screw lengths were significantly longer by a mean of 7.70 mm and 10.58 mm, respectively in the PSI group compared with conventional group (p=0.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.13-14.3; p=0.01, 95% CI=3.34-17.8). The mean superior screw lengths were 46.2 mm (range, 36-48 mm) and 38.5 mm (range, 20-48 mm) for PSI and conventional instrumentation, respectively, while the mean inferior screw lengths were 46.2 mm (range, 36-48 mm) in PSI and 35.6 mm (range, 20-48 mm) in conventional instrumentation. Conclusion: Significantly longer screws were placed using PSI. Long screws were reliably placed even in small glenoids with anteroposterior diameter of <25 mm. Routine use of PSI can improve placement of screws in RSA. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | 39th Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA) Annual Congress, 2019 | - |
dc.rights | 39th Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association (HKOA) Annual Congress, 2019. Copyright © Hong Kong Orthopaedic Association. | - |
dc.title | Improved Glenoid Component Screw Placement for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty by Surgeon Designed Patient-specific Instrumentation versus Conventional Method : A Comparative Study | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
dc.identifier.email | Yung, CS: csyyung@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Wong, KKH: shinoske@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Leung, FKL: klleunga@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Fang, CX: cfang@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Leung, FKL=rp00297 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Fang, CX=rp02016 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 310644 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Hong Kong | - |