File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: What are the obligations of the state? A public mental health ethics perspective on the Covid-19 lockdowns

TitleWhat are the obligations of the state? A public mental health ethics perspective on the Covid-19 lockdowns
Authors
Issue Date2020
PublisherBMJ Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://jme.bmjjournals.com/
Citation
Journal of Medical Ethics, 2020 How to Cite?
AbstractThe Covid-19 crisis has led to the unprecedented and widespread use of lockdown measures all over the world. With such drastic measures being imposed so widely and on such short notice, the concern is that the Covid-19 precedent, which has allowed the suspension of a wide range of human rights in a desperate attempt to curb the spread of the pandemic, is a dangerous one. Insufficient thought is being given to the effects of policies being put in place. In particular, the effects of these measures on the right to mental health are being overlooked, next to the harm done to the freedoms of movement, residence, assembly, and association.
DescriptionBlog - Posted on May 6, 2020
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/283726
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.952

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, D-
dc.contributor.authorIp, EC-
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-03T08:23:14Z-
dc.date.available2020-07-03T08:23:14Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Ethics, 2020-
dc.identifier.issn0306-6800-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/283726-
dc.descriptionBlog - Posted on May 6, 2020-
dc.description.abstractThe Covid-19 crisis has led to the unprecedented and widespread use of lockdown measures all over the world. With such drastic measures being imposed so widely and on such short notice, the concern is that the Covid-19 precedent, which has allowed the suspension of a wide range of human rights in a desperate attempt to curb the spread of the pandemic, is a dangerous one. Insufficient thought is being given to the effects of policies being put in place. In particular, the effects of these measures on the right to mental health are being overlooked, next to the harm done to the freedoms of movement, residence, assembly, and association.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://jme.bmjjournals.com/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Medical Ethics-
dc.rightsJournal of Medical Ethics. Copyright © BMJ Publishing Group.-
dc.rightsThis article has been accepted for publication in [Journal, Year] following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at [insert full DOI eg. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/xxxxx]. [© Authors (or their employer(s)) OR © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd ( for assignments of BMJ Case Reports)] <year>-
dc.titleWhat are the obligations of the state? A public mental health ethics perspective on the Covid-19 lockdowns-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, D: dtcheung@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailIp, EC: ericcip@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, D=rp02092-
dc.identifier.authorityIp, EC=rp02161-
dc.identifier.hkuros310656-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0306-6800-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats