File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1615/CritRevOncog.2018027528
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85054777381
- PMID: 30311576
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Immunotherapy for EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Title | Immunotherapy for EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Immunotherapy EBV |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Citation | Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis, 2018, v. 23, n. 3-4, p. 219-234 How to Cite? |
Abstract | © 2018 Begell House, Inc. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common head and neck malignancies in southern China and Southeast Asia. Unfortunately, 70% of NPC patients have locally advanced disease at the first diagnosis. Radiotherapy alone and concurrent chemoradiotherapy are important treatment approaches for NPC, but they have a limited effect on patients with locally advanced or distantly metastatic disease.1–5 Nevertheless, the unique immune environment of the EBV-associated NPC provides rational targets for immunotherapy. Diverse types of immunotherapies are actively being studied, including adoptive immunotherapy, therapeutic vaccines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, lytic-induction therapy, and viral immunotherapy. Specifically, adoptive immunotherapy with lymphocyte infusion was well tolerated and effective in 71.4% of patients combined with first-line chemotherapy. Several therapeutic vaccines and PD-1/PD-L1 pathway checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising clinic outcomes at phase I/II clinical trials. Moreover, EBV-lytic inducing therapy and viral immunotherapy for NPC are also being investigated. In this review, we summarized the current status, advantages, and disadvantages of each immunotherapy for EBV-associated NPC, which may shed light on developing safer and more effective treatment modalities in the future. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/286036 |
ISSN | 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.319 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hong, Mengying | - |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, Kejun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Qian, Jing | - |
dc.contributor.author | Deng, Hongyu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zeng, Musheng | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zheng, Shu | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ding, Kefeng | - |
dc.contributor.author | Du, Yushen | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sun, Ren | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-30T12:57:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-30T12:57:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis, 2018, v. 23, n. 3-4, p. 219-234 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0893-9675 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/286036 | - |
dc.description.abstract | © 2018 Begell House, Inc. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common head and neck malignancies in southern China and Southeast Asia. Unfortunately, 70% of NPC patients have locally advanced disease at the first diagnosis. Radiotherapy alone and concurrent chemoradiotherapy are important treatment approaches for NPC, but they have a limited effect on patients with locally advanced or distantly metastatic disease.1–5 Nevertheless, the unique immune environment of the EBV-associated NPC provides rational targets for immunotherapy. Diverse types of immunotherapies are actively being studied, including adoptive immunotherapy, therapeutic vaccines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, lytic-induction therapy, and viral immunotherapy. Specifically, adoptive immunotherapy with lymphocyte infusion was well tolerated and effective in 71.4% of patients combined with first-line chemotherapy. Several therapeutic vaccines and PD-1/PD-L1 pathway checkpoint inhibitors have shown promising clinic outcomes at phase I/II clinical trials. Moreover, EBV-lytic inducing therapy and viral immunotherapy for NPC are also being investigated. In this review, we summarized the current status, advantages, and disadvantages of each immunotherapy for EBV-associated NPC, which may shed light on developing safer and more effective treatment modalities in the future. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Critical Reviews in Oncogenesis | - |
dc.subject | Nasopharyngeal carcinoma | - |
dc.subject | Immunotherapy | - |
dc.subject | EBV | - |
dc.title | Immunotherapy for EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1615/CritRevOncog.2018027528 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 30311576 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85054777381 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 23 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3-4 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 219 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 234 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2162-6448 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0893-9675 | - |