File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Using routine health information data for research in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

TitleUsing routine health information data for research in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
Authors
KeywordsRoutine health information systems
Low- and middle-income countries
Systematic review
Issue Date2020
PublisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmchealthservres/
Citation
BMC Health Services Research, 2020, v. 20 n. 1, p. article no. 790 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Routine health information systems (RHISs) support resource allocation and management decisions at all levels of the health system, as well as strategy development and policy-making in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although RHIS data represent a rich source of information, such data are currently underused for research purposes, largely due to concerns over data quality. Given that substantial investments have been made in strengthening RHISs in LMICs in recent years, and that there is a growing demand for more real-time data from researchers, this systematic review builds upon the existing literature to summarize the extent to which RHIS data have been used in peer-reviewed research publications. Methods: Using terms ‘routine health information system’, ‘health information system’, or ‘health management information system’ and a list of LMICs, four electronic peer-review literature databases were searched from inception to February 202,019: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and EconLit. Articles were assessed for inclusion based on pre-determined eligibility criteria and study characteristics were extracted from included articles using a piloted data extraction form. Results: We identified 132 studies that met our inclusion criteria, originating in 37 different countries. Overall, the majority of the studies identified were from Sub-Saharan Africa and were published within the last 5 years. Malaria and maternal health were the most commonly studied health conditions, although a number of other health conditions and health services were also explored. Conclusions: Our study identified an increasing use of RHIS data for research purposes, with many studies applying rigorous study designs and analytic methods to advance program evaluation, monitoring and assessing services, and epidemiological studies in LMICs. RHIS data represent an underused source of data and should be made more available and further embraced by the research community in LMIC health systems.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286050
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.908
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.098
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHung, YW-
dc.contributor.authorHoxha, K-
dc.contributor.authorIrwin, BR-
dc.contributor.authorLaw, MR-
dc.contributor.authorGrepin, KA-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-31T06:58:23Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-31T06:58:23Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research, 2020, v. 20 n. 1, p. article no. 790-
dc.identifier.issn1472-6963-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286050-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Routine health information systems (RHISs) support resource allocation and management decisions at all levels of the health system, as well as strategy development and policy-making in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although RHIS data represent a rich source of information, such data are currently underused for research purposes, largely due to concerns over data quality. Given that substantial investments have been made in strengthening RHISs in LMICs in recent years, and that there is a growing demand for more real-time data from researchers, this systematic review builds upon the existing literature to summarize the extent to which RHIS data have been used in peer-reviewed research publications. Methods: Using terms ‘routine health information system’, ‘health information system’, or ‘health management information system’ and a list of LMICs, four electronic peer-review literature databases were searched from inception to February 202,019: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and EconLit. Articles were assessed for inclusion based on pre-determined eligibility criteria and study characteristics were extracted from included articles using a piloted data extraction form. Results: We identified 132 studies that met our inclusion criteria, originating in 37 different countries. Overall, the majority of the studies identified were from Sub-Saharan Africa and were published within the last 5 years. Malaria and maternal health were the most commonly studied health conditions, although a number of other health conditions and health services were also explored. Conclusions: Our study identified an increasing use of RHIS data for research purposes, with many studies applying rigorous study designs and analytic methods to advance program evaluation, monitoring and assessing services, and epidemiological studies in LMICs. RHIS data represent an underused source of data and should be made more available and further embraced by the research community in LMIC health systems.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmchealthservres/-
dc.relation.ispartofBMC Health Services Research-
dc.rightsBMC Health Services Research. Copyright © BioMed Central Ltd.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectRoutine health information systems-
dc.subjectLow- and middle-income countries-
dc.subjectSystematic review-
dc.titleUsing routine health information data for research in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailGrepin, KA: kgrepin@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityGrepin, KA=rp02646-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12913-020-05660-1-
dc.identifier.pmid32843033-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7446185-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85089930537-
dc.identifier.hkuros313785-
dc.identifier.volume20-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 790-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 790-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000567165100002-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl1472-6963-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats