File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.04.007
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85088015072
- PMID: 32690462
- WOS: WOS:000666969500006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Emergency surgery comparison of right versus left acute colonic diverticulitis: A 10-year outcome analysis
Title | Emergency surgery comparison of right versus left acute colonic diverticulitis: A 10-year outcome analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Right colonic diverticulitis Surgical outcome Emergency surgery |
Issue Date | 2021 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/surgeon/ |
Citation | The Surgeon, 2021, v. 19 n. 3, p. 150-155 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Introduction:
The difference in outcome between right (RCD) and left colonic diverticulitis (LCD) is not well established. The aim of this study was to analyse the presentation and surgical outcome of RCD versus left-sided disease following emergency surgery.
Method:
We conducted a retrospective review of patients presenting with acute diverticulitis over a 10-year period from 2004 to 2014 to a tertiary unit. Patient demographics, Hinchey classification, need for emergency surgery, perioperative outcome and recurrence were evaluated.
Results:
In total 360 patients presented with acute diverticulitis, 218 (61%) were right-sided and 142 (39%) were left-sided. The mean age (57 yrs vs 68 yrs) and median length of stay (4 days vs 5 days) were significantly less in RCD (p < 0.001). The need for emergency surgery was similar between RCD and LCD (30.7% vs 23.2%, p = 0.12). Sixty-seven (31%) patients with RCD required emergency surgery, 42 (62.7%) of these were based on a presumptive diagnosis of appendicitis and underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy only. Operative morbidity (10.4% vs 51.5%, p < 0.001) and mortality were significantly higher in LCD (1.5% v 15.2%, p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis of non-appendicectomy, RCD patients, showed LCD were more likely to require surgery (11.5% vs 23.2%, p = 0.003). There was no difference in recurrence (p = 0.6).
Conclusion:
Right colonic diverticulitis patients are younger and disease course is more benign compared to LCD. Presentation can be confused with appendicitis without proper imaging. In the rare cases where emergency surgery is required, RCD is associated with a lower operative morbidity and mortality compared to left-sided disease. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/286348 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.625 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tsang, JS | - |
dc.contributor.author | Foo, CC | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yip, J | - |
dc.contributor.author | Choi, HK | - |
dc.contributor.author | Law, WL | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lo, OSH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-31T07:02:36Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-31T07:02:36Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The Surgeon, 2021, v. 19 n. 3, p. 150-155 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1479-666X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/286348 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The difference in outcome between right (RCD) and left colonic diverticulitis (LCD) is not well established. The aim of this study was to analyse the presentation and surgical outcome of RCD versus left-sided disease following emergency surgery. Method: We conducted a retrospective review of patients presenting with acute diverticulitis over a 10-year period from 2004 to 2014 to a tertiary unit. Patient demographics, Hinchey classification, need for emergency surgery, perioperative outcome and recurrence were evaluated. Results: In total 360 patients presented with acute diverticulitis, 218 (61%) were right-sided and 142 (39%) were left-sided. The mean age (57 yrs vs 68 yrs) and median length of stay (4 days vs 5 days) were significantly less in RCD (p < 0.001). The need for emergency surgery was similar between RCD and LCD (30.7% vs 23.2%, p = 0.12). Sixty-seven (31%) patients with RCD required emergency surgery, 42 (62.7%) of these were based on a presumptive diagnosis of appendicitis and underwent laparoscopic appendicectomy only. Operative morbidity (10.4% vs 51.5%, p < 0.001) and mortality were significantly higher in LCD (1.5% v 15.2%, p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis of non-appendicectomy, RCD patients, showed LCD were more likely to require surgery (11.5% vs 23.2%, p = 0.003). There was no difference in recurrence (p = 0.6). Conclusion: Right colonic diverticulitis patients are younger and disease course is more benign compared to LCD. Presentation can be confused with appendicitis without proper imaging. In the rare cases where emergency surgery is required, RCD is associated with a lower operative morbidity and mortality compared to left-sided disease. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/surgeon/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The Surgeon | - |
dc.subject | Right colonic diverticulitis | - |
dc.subject | Surgical outcome | - |
dc.subject | Emergency surgery | - |
dc.title | Emergency surgery comparison of right versus left acute colonic diverticulitis: A 10-year outcome analysis | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Tsang, JS: julianst@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Foo, CC: ccfoo@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Yip, J: yipjeremy@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Choi, HK: hkchoi@HKUCC-COM.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Law, WL: lawwl@hkucc.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lo, OSH: oswens@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Foo, CC=rp01899 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Yip, J=rp02304 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Law, WL=rp00436 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.surge.2020.04.007 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 32690462 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85088015072 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 313142 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 19 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 150 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 155 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000666969500006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1479-666X | - |