File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Recommendations for head and neck surgical oncology practice in a setting of acute severe resource constraint during the Covid-19 pandemic: an international consensus

TitleRecommendations for head and neck surgical oncology practice in a setting of acute severe resource constraint during the Covid-19 pandemic: an international consensus
Authors
Keywordsclinical practice
clinician
consensus
coronavirus disease 2019
Delphi study
Issue Date2020
PublisherThe Lancet Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/j.lancetoncol
Citation
The Lancet Oncology, 2020, v. 21 n. 7, p. E350-E359 How to Cite?
AbstractSummary The speed and scale of the global COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented pressures on health services worldwide, requiring new methods of service delivery during the health crisis. In the setting of severe resource constraint and high risk of infection to patients and clinicians, there is an urgent need to identify consensus statements on head and neck surgical oncology practice. We completed a modified Delphi consensus process of three rounds with 40 international experts in head and neck cancer surgical, radiation, and medical oncology, representing 35 international professional societies and national clinical trial groups. Endorsed by 39 societies and professional bodies, these consensus practice recommendations aim to decrease inconsistency of practice, reduce uncertainty in care, and provide reassurance for clinicians worldwide for head and neck surgical oncology in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and in the setting of acute severe resource constraint and high risk of infection to patients and staff.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286349
ISSN
2020 Impact Factor: 41.316
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 13.530
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMehanna, H-
dc.contributor.authorHardman, JC-
dc.contributor.authorShenson, JA-
dc.contributor.authorAbou-Foul, AK-
dc.contributor.authorTopf, MC-
dc.contributor.authorAlFalasi, M-
dc.contributor.authorChan, JYK-
dc.contributor.authorChaturvedi, P-
dc.contributor.authorChow, VLY-
dc.contributor.authorDietz, A-
dc.contributor.authorFagan, JJ-
dc.contributor.authorGodballe, C-
dc.contributor.authorGolusinski, W-
dc.contributor.authorHomma, A-
dc.contributor.authorHosal, S-
dc.contributor.authorIyer, NG-
dc.contributor.authorKerawala, C-
dc.contributor.authorKoh, YW-
dc.contributor.authorKonney, A-
dc.contributor.authorKowalski, LP-
dc.contributor.authorKraus, D-
dc.contributor.authorKuriakose, MA-
dc.contributor.authorKyrodimos, E-
dc.contributor.authorLai, SY-
dc.contributor.authorLeemans, CR-
dc.contributor.authorLennon, P-
dc.contributor.authorLicitra, L-
dc.contributor.authorLou, PJ-
dc.contributor.authorLyons, B-
dc.contributor.authorMirghani, H-
dc.contributor.authorNichols, AC-
dc.contributor.authorPaleri, V-
dc.contributor.authorPanizza, BJ-
dc.contributor.authorParente Arias, P-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, MR-
dc.contributor.authorPiazza, C-
dc.contributor.authorRischin, D-
dc.contributor.authorSanabria, A-
dc.contributor.authorTakes, RP-
dc.contributor.authorThomson, DJ-
dc.contributor.authorUppaluri, R-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Y-
dc.contributor.authorYom, SS-
dc.contributor.authorZhu, YM-
dc.contributor.authorPorceddu, S-
dc.contributor.authorde Almeida, JR-
dc.contributor.authorSimon, C-
dc.contributor.authorHolsinger, FC-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-31T07:02:37Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-31T07:02:37Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationThe Lancet Oncology, 2020, v. 21 n. 7, p. E350-E359-
dc.identifier.issn1470-2045-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286349-
dc.description.abstractSummary The speed and scale of the global COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented pressures on health services worldwide, requiring new methods of service delivery during the health crisis. In the setting of severe resource constraint and high risk of infection to patients and clinicians, there is an urgent need to identify consensus statements on head and neck surgical oncology practice. We completed a modified Delphi consensus process of three rounds with 40 international experts in head and neck cancer surgical, radiation, and medical oncology, representing 35 international professional societies and national clinical trial groups. Endorsed by 39 societies and professional bodies, these consensus practice recommendations aim to decrease inconsistency of practice, reduce uncertainty in care, and provide reassurance for clinicians worldwide for head and neck surgical oncology in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and in the setting of acute severe resource constraint and high risk of infection to patients and staff.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherThe Lancet Publishing Group. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/j.lancetoncol-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Lancet Oncology-
dc.subjectclinical practice-
dc.subjectclinician-
dc.subjectconsensus-
dc.subjectcoronavirus disease 2019-
dc.subjectDelphi study-
dc.titleRecommendations for head and neck surgical oncology practice in a setting of acute severe resource constraint during the Covid-19 pandemic: an international consensus-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChow, VLY: chowlyv@hku.hk-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30334-X-
dc.identifier.pmid32534633-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7289563-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85086936214-
dc.identifier.hkuros313349-
dc.identifier.volume21-
dc.identifier.issue7-
dc.identifier.spageE350-
dc.identifier.epageE359-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000545328900006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl1470-2045-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats