File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evaluating the attractiveness of a new light rail extension: Testing simple change and displacement change hypotheses

TitleEvaluating the attractiveness of a new light rail extension: Testing simple change and displacement change hypotheses
Authors
KeywordsBus
Ridership
Light rail
Complete streets
Issue Date2016
Citation
Transport Policy, 2016, v. 45, p. 15-23 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. Many communities in the United States have been adding new light rail to bus-predominant public transit systems. However, there is disagreement as to whether opening light rail lines attracts new ridership or merely draws ridership from existing transit users. We study a new light rail line in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, which is part of a complete street redevelopment. We utilize a pre-test post-test control group quasi-experimental design to test two different measures of ridership change. The first measure is calculated from stops along the light rail route; the second assumes that nearby bus stops might be displaced by the rail and calculates ridership change with those stops included as baseline. Both the simple measure (transit use changes on the complete street light rail corridor) and the "displacement" measure (transit use changes in the one-quarter mile catchment areas around new light rail stops) showed significant (p<.01) and substantial (677%) increases in transit passengers compared to pre-light rail bus users. In particular, the displacement analysis discredits a common challenge that when a new light rail line opens, most passengers are simply former bus riders whose routes were canceled in favor of light rail. The study suggests that light rail services can attract additional ridership to public transit systems. In addition, although pre-post control-group designs require time and effort, this project underscores the benefits of such quasi-experimental designs in terms of the strength of the inferences that can be drawn about the impacts of new transit infrastructure and services.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286920
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.742
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Carol M.-
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Barbara B.-
dc.contributor.authorTribby, Calvin P.-
dc.contributor.authorTharp, Doug-
dc.contributor.authorFlick, Kristi-
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Harvey J.-
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Ken R.-
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Wyatt-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-07T11:46:01Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-07T11:46:01Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationTransport Policy, 2016, v. 45, p. 15-23-
dc.identifier.issn0967-070X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286920-
dc.description.abstract© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. Many communities in the United States have been adding new light rail to bus-predominant public transit systems. However, there is disagreement as to whether opening light rail lines attracts new ridership or merely draws ridership from existing transit users. We study a new light rail line in Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, which is part of a complete street redevelopment. We utilize a pre-test post-test control group quasi-experimental design to test two different measures of ridership change. The first measure is calculated from stops along the light rail route; the second assumes that nearby bus stops might be displaced by the rail and calculates ridership change with those stops included as baseline. Both the simple measure (transit use changes on the complete street light rail corridor) and the "displacement" measure (transit use changes in the one-quarter mile catchment areas around new light rail stops) showed significant (p<.01) and substantial (677%) increases in transit passengers compared to pre-light rail bus users. In particular, the displacement analysis discredits a common challenge that when a new light rail line opens, most passengers are simply former bus riders whose routes were canceled in favor of light rail. The study suggests that light rail services can attract additional ridership to public transit systems. In addition, although pre-post control-group designs require time and effort, this project underscores the benefits of such quasi-experimental designs in terms of the strength of the inferences that can be drawn about the impacts of new transit infrastructure and services.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofTransport Policy-
dc.subjectBus-
dc.subjectRidership-
dc.subjectLight rail-
dc.subjectComplete streets-
dc.titleEvaluating the attractiveness of a new light rail extension: Testing simple change and displacement change hypotheses-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.003-
dc.identifier.pmid26543329-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC4629857-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84942011743-
dc.identifier.volume45-
dc.identifier.spage15-
dc.identifier.epage23-
dc.identifier.eissn1879-310X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000366080100002-
dc.identifier.issnl0967-070X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats