File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Apples and dragon fruits: The determinants of aid and other forms of state financing from China to Africa

TitleApples and dragon fruits: The determinants of aid and other forms of state financing from China to Africa
Authors
Issue Date2018
Citation
International Studies Quarterly, 2018, v. 62, n. 1, p. 182-194 How to Cite?
Abstract© The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. Chinese "aid" is a lightning rod for criticism. Policy-makers, journalists, and public intellectuals claim that Beijing uses its largesse to cement alliances with political leaders, secure access to natural resources, and create exclusive commercial opportunities for Chinese firms-all at the expense of citizens living in developing countries. We argue that much of the controversy about Chinese "aid" stems from a failure to distinguish between China's Official Development Assistance (ODA) and morecommercially oriented sources and types of state financing. Using a new database on China's official financing commitments to Africa from 2000 to 2013, we find that the allocation of Chinese ODA is driven primarily by foreign policy considerations, while economic interests better explain the distribution of less concessional flows. These results highlight the need for better measures of an increasingly diverse set of non-Western financial activities.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286959
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 2.799
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.897
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDreher, Axel-
dc.contributor.authorFuchs, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorParks, Brad-
dc.contributor.authorStrange, Austin M.-
dc.contributor.authorTierney, Michael J.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-07T11:46:07Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-07T11:46:07Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Studies Quarterly, 2018, v. 62, n. 1, p. 182-194-
dc.identifier.issn0020-8833-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286959-
dc.description.abstract© The Author(s) (2018). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. All rights reserved. Chinese "aid" is a lightning rod for criticism. Policy-makers, journalists, and public intellectuals claim that Beijing uses its largesse to cement alliances with political leaders, secure access to natural resources, and create exclusive commercial opportunities for Chinese firms-all at the expense of citizens living in developing countries. We argue that much of the controversy about Chinese "aid" stems from a failure to distinguish between China's Official Development Assistance (ODA) and morecommercially oriented sources and types of state financing. Using a new database on China's official financing commitments to Africa from 2000 to 2013, we find that the allocation of Chinese ODA is driven primarily by foreign policy considerations, while economic interests better explain the distribution of less concessional flows. These results highlight the need for better measures of an increasingly diverse set of non-Western financial activities.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Studies Quarterly-
dc.titleApples and dragon fruits: The determinants of aid and other forms of state financing from China to Africa-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/isq/sqx052-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85044747361-
dc.identifier.volume62-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage182-
dc.identifier.epage194-
dc.identifier.eissn1468-2478-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000428549600015-
dc.identifier.issnl0020-8833-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats