File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: ‘Ground-Truthing’ Chinese Development Finance in Africa: Field Evidence from South Africa and Uganda

Title‘Ground-Truthing’ Chinese Development Finance in Africa: Field Evidence from South Africa and Uganda
Authors
Issue Date2016
Citation
Journal of Development Studies, 2016, v. 52, n. 6, p. 780-796 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. A new methodology, Tracking Underreported Financial Flows (TUFF), leverages open-source information on development finance by non-transparent, non-Western donors. If such open-source methods prove to be valid and reliable, they can enhance our understanding of the causes and consequences of development finance from non-transparent donors including, but not limited to, China. But open-source methods face charges of inaccuracy. In this study we create and field-test a replicable ‘ground-truthing’ methodology to verify, update, and improve open-source data with in-person interviews and site visits in Uganda and South Africa. Ground-truthing generally reveals close agreement between open-source data and answers to protocol questions from informants with official roles in the Chinese-funded projects. Our findings suggest that open-source data collection, while limited in knowable ways, can provide a stronger empirical foundation for research on development finance.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/287052
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.029
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMuchapondwa, Edwin-
dc.contributor.authorNielson, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorParks, Bradley-
dc.contributor.authorStrange, Austin M.-
dc.contributor.authorTierney, Michael J.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-07T11:46:22Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-07T11:46:22Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Development Studies, 2016, v. 52, n. 6, p. 780-796-
dc.identifier.issn0022-0388-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/287052-
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. A new methodology, Tracking Underreported Financial Flows (TUFF), leverages open-source information on development finance by non-transparent, non-Western donors. If such open-source methods prove to be valid and reliable, they can enhance our understanding of the causes and consequences of development finance from non-transparent donors including, but not limited to, China. But open-source methods face charges of inaccuracy. In this study we create and field-test a replicable ‘ground-truthing’ methodology to verify, update, and improve open-source data with in-person interviews and site visits in Uganda and South Africa. Ground-truthing generally reveals close agreement between open-source data and answers to protocol questions from informants with official roles in the Chinese-funded projects. Our findings suggest that open-source data collection, while limited in knowable ways, can provide a stronger empirical foundation for research on development finance.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Development Studies-
dc.title‘Ground-Truthing’ Chinese Development Finance in Africa: Field Evidence from South Africa and Uganda-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00220388.2015.1087510-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84964330696-
dc.identifier.volume52-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage780-
dc.identifier.epage796-
dc.identifier.eissn1743-9140-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000375947900002-
dc.identifier.issnl0022-0388-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats