File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: On the joint impact of high-speed rail and megalopolis policy on regional economic growth in China

TitleOn the joint impact of high-speed rail and megalopolis policy on regional economic growth in China
Authors
KeywordsHigh-speed rail
Megalopolis
Regional economic growth
Joint impact
Difference-in-differences
Issue Date2020
PublisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/tranpol
Citation
Transport Policy, 2020, v. 99, p. 20-30 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper quantifies multifold effects of megalopolis (MP) and high-speed railway (HSR) inaugurations on regional economic growth, in the context of MP and HSR development in China during 1996–2017. Three types of policy interventions are examined, i.e., MP inauguration, HSR introduction, and the joint intervention of MP and HSR. The difference-in-differences (DID) method is adopted to quantify these effects among different groups of prefecture-level cities in China. Specifically, we firstly examine the effects of MP and HSR inaugurations on prefectural economic output, respectively. The simultaneous and joint impact of MP and HSR is then estimated by examining the effect of their interaction. We find that while both MP inauguration and HSR induction have stimulating effects on regional economic growth, the effect of MP inauguration is dominating. Moreover, the joint intervention of MP and HSR is significantly larger than either MP or HSR, and even larger than the sum of two individual effects. Comparing the effects of HSR among different city groups, we find that MP cities are likely to benefit more from HSR service than those not in an MP. Among various MPs, the joint intervention tends to be associated with larger economic growth in MPs with better economic development foundations. These observations imply that the strategical and transport policy interventions have reinforcing effects on one another. However, the simultaneous impact may contribute to regional development disparity since the most developed regions may benefit more from the joint intervention by siphoning resources from disadvantaged regions. Overall, the results shed lights on the interactive developments of transportation infrastructure and urban agglomerations.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/287663
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.742
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYang, Z-
dc.contributor.authorLi, C-
dc.contributor.authorJiao, J-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, W-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, F-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T12:01:24Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-05T12:01:24Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationTransport Policy, 2020, v. 99, p. 20-30-
dc.identifier.issn0967-070X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/287663-
dc.description.abstractThis paper quantifies multifold effects of megalopolis (MP) and high-speed railway (HSR) inaugurations on regional economic growth, in the context of MP and HSR development in China during 1996–2017. Three types of policy interventions are examined, i.e., MP inauguration, HSR introduction, and the joint intervention of MP and HSR. The difference-in-differences (DID) method is adopted to quantify these effects among different groups of prefecture-level cities in China. Specifically, we firstly examine the effects of MP and HSR inaugurations on prefectural economic output, respectively. The simultaneous and joint impact of MP and HSR is then estimated by examining the effect of their interaction. We find that while both MP inauguration and HSR induction have stimulating effects on regional economic growth, the effect of MP inauguration is dominating. Moreover, the joint intervention of MP and HSR is significantly larger than either MP or HSR, and even larger than the sum of two individual effects. Comparing the effects of HSR among different city groups, we find that MP cities are likely to benefit more from HSR service than those not in an MP. Among various MPs, the joint intervention tends to be associated with larger economic growth in MPs with better economic development foundations. These observations imply that the strategical and transport policy interventions have reinforcing effects on one another. However, the simultaneous impact may contribute to regional development disparity since the most developed regions may benefit more from the joint intervention by siphoning resources from disadvantaged regions. Overall, the results shed lights on the interactive developments of transportation infrastructure and urban agglomerations.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/tranpol-
dc.relation.ispartofTransport Policy-
dc.subjectHigh-speed rail-
dc.subjectMegalopolis-
dc.subjectRegional economic growth-
dc.subjectJoint impact-
dc.subjectDifference-in-differences-
dc.titleOn the joint impact of high-speed rail and megalopolis policy on regional economic growth in China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailZhang, F: fnzhang@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityZhang, F=rp02657-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.08.007-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85089847696-
dc.identifier.hkuros314940-
dc.identifier.volume99-
dc.identifier.spage20-
dc.identifier.epage30-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000590674600003-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0967-070X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats