File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120749
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85080045340
- WOS: WOS:000524981300046
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Construction waste minimization in green building: A comparative analysis of LEED-NC 2009 certified projects in the US and China
Title | Construction waste minimization in green building: A comparative analysis of LEED-NC 2009 certified projects in the US and China |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Green building Green building rating system Leadership in energy and environmental design Construction waste minimization |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | Elsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro |
Citation | Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, v. 256, article no. 120749 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Construction waste minimization is a key sustainability goal in green building rating systems. Although these rating systems traverse countries’ boundaries, no research so far has compared construction waste minimization performance in such systems across countries. This research aims to investigate and compare the construction waste minimization performance of green building projects in the US and China by focusing on the widely adopted LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification system. Data on 599 and 297 LEED-New Construction (NC) 2009 certified projects in the US and China, respectively, were sourced from the US Green Building Council project directory. Their construction waste minimization-related points were compared using the Mann-Whitney U and effect size test, and semi-structured interviews were conducted to identify the possible causes behind statistical analysis results. We found no significant difference in construction waste minimization performance of LEED platinum-level projects in the US and China, but the magnitude of the difference between two countries increased as the certification level went lower. The enforcement on regulations, recycling market development, public consciousness and advanced technologies lead to the differences while the influence of the political, economic, social, and technological context increased when the projects were certified with lower LEED levels. An amenable context should be fostered to achieve a better construction waste minimization performance in green building and a sustainable development goal. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/287712 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 9.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.058 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chi, B | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lu, W | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ye, M | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bao, Z | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, X | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-05T12:02:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-05T12:02:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, v. 256, article no. 120749 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0959-6526 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/287712 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Construction waste minimization is a key sustainability goal in green building rating systems. Although these rating systems traverse countries’ boundaries, no research so far has compared construction waste minimization performance in such systems across countries. This research aims to investigate and compare the construction waste minimization performance of green building projects in the US and China by focusing on the widely adopted LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification system. Data on 599 and 297 LEED-New Construction (NC) 2009 certified projects in the US and China, respectively, were sourced from the US Green Building Council project directory. Their construction waste minimization-related points were compared using the Mann-Whitney U and effect size test, and semi-structured interviews were conducted to identify the possible causes behind statistical analysis results. We found no significant difference in construction waste minimization performance of LEED platinum-level projects in the US and China, but the magnitude of the difference between two countries increased as the certification level went lower. The enforcement on regulations, recycling market development, public consciousness and advanced technologies lead to the differences while the influence of the political, economic, social, and technological context increased when the projects were certified with lower LEED levels. An amenable context should be fostered to achieve a better construction waste minimization performance in green building and a sustainable development goal. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Cleaner Production | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | Green building | - |
dc.subject | Green building rating system | - |
dc.subject | Leadership in energy and environmental design | - |
dc.subject | Construction waste minimization | - |
dc.title | Construction waste minimization in green building: A comparative analysis of LEED-NC 2009 certified projects in the US and China | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Chi, B: simon.chi@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lu, W: wilsonlu@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lu, W=rp01362 | - |
dc.description.nature | postprint | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120749 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85080045340 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 315336 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 256 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | article no. 120749 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | article no. 120749 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000524981300046 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Netherlands | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0959-6526 | - |