File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/jnci/djz113
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85075023860
- PMID: 31165158
- WOS: WOS:000582307200009
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparative Validation of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models and Projections for Future Risk Stratification
Title | Comparative Validation of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models and Projections for Future Risk Stratification |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | adolescent adult aged breast tumor female |
Issue Date | 2020 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://jncicancerspectrum.oxfordjournals.org/ |
Citation | JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2020, v. 112 n. 3, p. 278-285 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background:
External validation of risk models is critical for risk-stratified breast cancer prevention. We used the Individualized Coherent Absolute Risk Estimation (iCARE) as a flexible tool for risk model development and comparative model validation and to make projections for population risk stratification.
Methods:
Performance of two recently developed models, one based on the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium analysis (iCARE-BPC3) and another based on a literature review (iCARE-Lit), were compared with two established models (Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool and International Breast Cancer Intervention Study Model) based on classical risk factors in a UK-based cohort of 64 874 white non-Hispanic women (863 patients) age 35–74 years. Risk projections in a target population of US white non-Hispanic women age 50–70 years assessed potential improvements in risk stratification by adding mammographic breast density (MD) and polygenic risk score (PRS).
Results:
The best calibrated models were iCARE-Lit (expected to observed number of cases [E/O] = 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87 to 1.11) for women younger than 50 years, and iCARE-BPC3 (E/O = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.09) for women 50 years or older. Risk projections using iCARE-BPC3 indicated classical risk factors can identify approximately 500 000 women at moderate to high risk (>3% 5-year risk) in the target population. Addition of MD and a 313-variant PRS is expected to increase this number to approximately 3.5 million women, and among them, approximately 153 000 are expected to develop invasive breast cancer within 5 years.
Conclusions:
iCARE models based on classical risk factors perform similarly to or better than BCRAT or IBIS in white non-Hispanic women. Addition of MD and PRS can lead to substantial improvements in risk stratification. However, these integrated models require independent prospective validation before broad clinical applications. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/288170 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 9.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.986 |
PubMed Central ID | |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pal Choudhury, P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wilcox, AN | - |
dc.contributor.author | Brook, MN | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Y | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ahearn, T | - |
dc.contributor.author | Orr, N | - |
dc.contributor.author | Coulson, P | - |
dc.contributor.author | Schoemaker, MJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jones, ME | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gail, MH | - |
dc.contributor.author | Swerdlow, AJ | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chatterjee, N | - |
dc.contributor.author | Garcia-Closas, M | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-05T12:08:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-05T12:08:54Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2020, v. 112 n. 3, p. 278-285 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0027-8874 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/288170 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: External validation of risk models is critical for risk-stratified breast cancer prevention. We used the Individualized Coherent Absolute Risk Estimation (iCARE) as a flexible tool for risk model development and comparative model validation and to make projections for population risk stratification. Methods: Performance of two recently developed models, one based on the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium analysis (iCARE-BPC3) and another based on a literature review (iCARE-Lit), were compared with two established models (Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool and International Breast Cancer Intervention Study Model) based on classical risk factors in a UK-based cohort of 64 874 white non-Hispanic women (863 patients) age 35–74 years. Risk projections in a target population of US white non-Hispanic women age 50–70 years assessed potential improvements in risk stratification by adding mammographic breast density (MD) and polygenic risk score (PRS). Results: The best calibrated models were iCARE-Lit (expected to observed number of cases [E/O] = 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.87 to 1.11) for women younger than 50 years, and iCARE-BPC3 (E/O = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.09) for women 50 years or older. Risk projections using iCARE-BPC3 indicated classical risk factors can identify approximately 500 000 women at moderate to high risk (>3% 5-year risk) in the target population. Addition of MD and a 313-variant PRS is expected to increase this number to approximately 3.5 million women, and among them, approximately 153 000 are expected to develop invasive breast cancer within 5 years. Conclusions: iCARE models based on classical risk factors perform similarly to or better than BCRAT or IBIS in white non-Hispanic women. Addition of MD and PRS can lead to substantial improvements in risk stratification. However, these integrated models require independent prospective validation before broad clinical applications. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://jncicancerspectrum.oxfordjournals.org/ | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | - |
dc.rights | Pre-print: Journal Title] ©: [year] [owner as specified on the article] Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of xxxxxx]. All rights reserved. Pre-print (Once an article is published, preprint notice should be amended to): This is an electronic version of an article published in [include the complete citation information for the final version of the Article as published in the print edition of the Journal.] Post-print: This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in [insert journal title] following peer review. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: xxxxxxx [insert URL that the author will receive upon publication here]. | - |
dc.subject | adolescent | - |
dc.subject | adult | - |
dc.subject | aged | - |
dc.subject | breast tumor | - |
dc.subject | female | - |
dc.title | Comparative Validation of Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Models and Projections for Future Risk Stratification | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Zhang, Y: doraz@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Zhang, Y=rp02590 | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/jnci/djz113 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 31165158 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC7073933 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85075023860 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 315215 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 112 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 278 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 285 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000582307200009 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0027-8874 | - |