File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Health System Responsiveness in Hong Kong: A comparison between South Asian and Chinese patients' experiences

TitleHealth System Responsiveness in Hong Kong: A comparison between South Asian and Chinese patients' experiences
Authors
KeywordsEthnic minority
Healthcare disparity
Healthcare system
Health system responsiveness
Patient-provider communication
Issue Date2020
PublisherWB Saunders Co Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/puhe
Citation
Public Health, 2020, v. 182, p. 81-87 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: Health system responsiveness is related to the way and the environment in which individuals are treated during their health system interaction. Generally, patients who are members of ethnic minority (EM) groups encounter more challenges in receiving healthcare services and bear a disproportionate burden of diseases compared with most counterparts. We aimed to compare the health system responsiveness perceived by South Asian (SA) EM people with that of local Chinese people in Hong Kong. Study design: The cross-sectional survey sample comprised 575 SA and 494 Chinese individuals. The health system responsiveness module of the World Health Survey 2002 was used for data collection. Methods: We used propensity score weighting method to balance the two groups. Simple and multiple regressions were used to compare the perceived outpatient and inpatient health system responsiveness between SA and Chinese participants, respectively, before and after adjustment for demographics. All estimates were accompanied by 95% confidence intervals, and two-sided tests were conducted with significance concluded by a P value < 0∙05. Results: Compared with the Chinese participants, the SA participants reported generally lower health system responsiveness for outpatient and inpatient services. The top three mean score difference (SA-Chinese) for outpatient care included autonomy (−0.78, P < 0.001), communication (−0.67, P < 0.001), and choice (−0.53, P < 0.001), and the top three mean score difference for inpatient care included communication (−0.90, P < 0.001), autonomy (−0.82, P < 0.001), and choice (−0.61, P < 0.01). In addition, SA participants also experienced lower responsiveness in access to community support (−0.81, P < 0.001) during hospitalization but perceived higher quality of basic amenities (0.29, P < 0.001) and confidentiality (0.44, P < 0.01) in outpatient settings. Conclusion: SA participants in an urbanized Chinese-oriented society reported generally lower health system responsiveness compared with the local Chinese group; however, SA participants perceived higher confidentiality and quality of basic amenities in their outpatient experience. Concerted efforts from healthcare providers and policymakers are required to improve the existing healthcare system for users of members of EM groups.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/288209
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.9
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.203
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVANDAN, N-
dc.contributor.authorWong, JYH-
dc.contributor.authorGONG, WJ-
dc.contributor.authorYip, PSF-
dc.contributor.authorFong, DYT-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T12:09:28Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-05T12:09:28Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationPublic Health, 2020, v. 182, p. 81-87-
dc.identifier.issn0033-3506-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/288209-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Health system responsiveness is related to the way and the environment in which individuals are treated during their health system interaction. Generally, patients who are members of ethnic minority (EM) groups encounter more challenges in receiving healthcare services and bear a disproportionate burden of diseases compared with most counterparts. We aimed to compare the health system responsiveness perceived by South Asian (SA) EM people with that of local Chinese people in Hong Kong. Study design: The cross-sectional survey sample comprised 575 SA and 494 Chinese individuals. The health system responsiveness module of the World Health Survey 2002 was used for data collection. Methods: We used propensity score weighting method to balance the two groups. Simple and multiple regressions were used to compare the perceived outpatient and inpatient health system responsiveness between SA and Chinese participants, respectively, before and after adjustment for demographics. All estimates were accompanied by 95% confidence intervals, and two-sided tests were conducted with significance concluded by a P value < 0∙05. Results: Compared with the Chinese participants, the SA participants reported generally lower health system responsiveness for outpatient and inpatient services. The top three mean score difference (SA-Chinese) for outpatient care included autonomy (−0.78, P < 0.001), communication (−0.67, P < 0.001), and choice (−0.53, P < 0.001), and the top three mean score difference for inpatient care included communication (−0.90, P < 0.001), autonomy (−0.82, P < 0.001), and choice (−0.61, P < 0.01). In addition, SA participants also experienced lower responsiveness in access to community support (−0.81, P < 0.001) during hospitalization but perceived higher quality of basic amenities (0.29, P < 0.001) and confidentiality (0.44, P < 0.01) in outpatient settings. Conclusion: SA participants in an urbanized Chinese-oriented society reported generally lower health system responsiveness compared with the local Chinese group; however, SA participants perceived higher confidentiality and quality of basic amenities in their outpatient experience. Concerted efforts from healthcare providers and policymakers are required to improve the existing healthcare system for users of members of EM groups.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWB Saunders Co Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/puhe-
dc.relation.ispartofPublic Health-
dc.subjectEthnic minority-
dc.subjectHealthcare disparity-
dc.subjectHealthcare system-
dc.subjectHealth system responsiveness-
dc.subjectPatient-provider communication-
dc.titleHealth System Responsiveness in Hong Kong: A comparison between South Asian and Chinese patients' experiences-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailWong, JYH: janetyh@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailYip, PSF: sfpyip@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailFong, DYT: dytfong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWong, JYH=rp01561-
dc.identifier.authorityYip, PSF=rp00596-
dc.identifier.authorityFong, DYT=rp00253-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.puhe.2020.01.019-
dc.identifier.pmid32200074-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85081714501-
dc.identifier.hkuros315616-
dc.identifier.volume182-
dc.identifier.spage81-
dc.identifier.epage87-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000541371200016-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0033-3506-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats