File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evaluating the environmental impacts of stabilization and solidification technologies for managing hazardous wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study of Hong Kong

TitleEvaluating the environmental impacts of stabilization and solidification technologies for managing hazardous wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study of Hong Kong
Authors
KeywordsContaminated sediment
Waste incineration fly ash
Stabilization/solidification
Green remediation
Construction utilization
Issue Date2020
PublisherElsevier: Creative Commons Licenses. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/envint
Citation
Environment International, 2020, v. 145, p. article no. 106139 How to Cite?
AbstractProper management of hazardous materials arouses widespread environmental concerns due to its enormous ecological and health impacts. The development of green stabilization/solidification (S/S) technology for resourceful utilization of hazardous materials, as well as the immobilization of potentially toxic elements is of great scientific interests. Cement-based S/S is often considered a low-cost and highly efficient technology, but the environmental sustainability of a broad spectrum of S/S technologies has yet to be evaluated. Therefore, this study assessed the environmental sustainability of S/S technologies for managing two common types of hazardous wastes, i.e., contaminated marine sediment and municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MIFA) by using life cycle assessment (LCA). A total of 17 scenarios under three strategies for sediment and two strategies for MIFA S/S technologies were comprehensively evaluated. The LCA results identified the most preferable S/S technology in each strategy. In particular, Scenario 1 (mixture of sediment with a small percentage of ordinary Portland cement and incinerated sewage sludge ash) of Strategy 1 (use as fill materials) would be the preferred option, as it reduces about 54% and 70% global warming potential compared to those of Scenarios 2 and 3, respectively. This is the first initiative for evaluating the environmental impacts of a wide range of recently developed S/S technologies using green/alternative binders for diverting hazardous wastes from disposal. The results can serve as a decision support for the practical application of the environmentally friendly S/S technology for sustainable remediation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/288453
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 13.352
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.582
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHossain, MU-
dc.contributor.authorLei, W-
dc.contributor.authorChen, L-
dc.contributor.authorTsang, DCW-
dc.contributor.authorNg, ST-
dc.contributor.authorPoon, CS-
dc.contributor.authorMechtcherine, V-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-05T12:13:08Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-05T12:13:08Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironment International, 2020, v. 145, p. article no. 106139-
dc.identifier.issn0160-4120-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/288453-
dc.description.abstractProper management of hazardous materials arouses widespread environmental concerns due to its enormous ecological and health impacts. The development of green stabilization/solidification (S/S) technology for resourceful utilization of hazardous materials, as well as the immobilization of potentially toxic elements is of great scientific interests. Cement-based S/S is often considered a low-cost and highly efficient technology, but the environmental sustainability of a broad spectrum of S/S technologies has yet to be evaluated. Therefore, this study assessed the environmental sustainability of S/S technologies for managing two common types of hazardous wastes, i.e., contaminated marine sediment and municipal solid waste incineration fly ash (MIFA) by using life cycle assessment (LCA). A total of 17 scenarios under three strategies for sediment and two strategies for MIFA S/S technologies were comprehensively evaluated. The LCA results identified the most preferable S/S technology in each strategy. In particular, Scenario 1 (mixture of sediment with a small percentage of ordinary Portland cement and incinerated sewage sludge ash) of Strategy 1 (use as fill materials) would be the preferred option, as it reduces about 54% and 70% global warming potential compared to those of Scenarios 2 and 3, respectively. This is the first initiative for evaluating the environmental impacts of a wide range of recently developed S/S technologies using green/alternative binders for diverting hazardous wastes from disposal. The results can serve as a decision support for the practical application of the environmentally friendly S/S technology for sustainable remediation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier: Creative Commons Licenses. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/envint-
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironment International-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectContaminated sediment-
dc.subjectWaste incineration fly ash-
dc.subjectStabilization/solidification-
dc.subjectGreen remediation-
dc.subjectConstruction utilization-
dc.titleEvaluating the environmental impacts of stabilization and solidification technologies for managing hazardous wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study of Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHossain, MU: uzzal@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailNg, ST: tstng@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHossain, MU=rp02580-
dc.identifier.authorityNg, ST=rp00158-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envint.2020.106139-
dc.identifier.pmid32980737-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85091630831-
dc.identifier.hkuros315468-
dc.identifier.volume145-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 106139-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 106139-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000580632000055-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0160-4120-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats