File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Input manipulation, enhancement and processing: Theoretical views and empirical research

TitleInput manipulation, enhancement and processing: Theoretical views and empirical research
Authors
KeywordsTextual enhancement
Processing instruction
Input flood
Input enhancement
Issue Date2016
Citation
Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2016, v. 6, n. 1, p. 65-88 How to Cite?
Abstract© 2016, Adam Mickiewicz University Press. All rights reserved. Researchers in the field of instructed second language acquisition have been examining the issue of how learners interact with input by conducting research measuring particular kinds of instructional interventions (input-oriented and meaning-based). These interventions include such things as input flood, textual enhancement and processing instruction. Although the findings are not completely conclusive on whether these instructional interventions have an impact on acquisition, it is clear that we have witnessed a shift in the field from the original question “Does instruction make a difference?” to the more specific question “Does manipulating input make a difference?” In this article, the key classroom-based research conducted to measure the relative effects of different types of enhancement and manipulation is reviewed. Three main research foci are considered: (a) research measuring the effects of saturating the input with the target form (input flood), (b) research measuring the effects of different types of textual enhancements to draw learners’ attention to the target form, and (c) research measuring input restructuring to improve interpretation and processing of target forms or structures (processing instruction).
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/288738
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.455
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBenati, Alessandro-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-12T08:05:44Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-12T08:05:44Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationStudies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2016, v. 6, n. 1, p. 65-88-
dc.identifier.issn2083-5205-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/288738-
dc.description.abstract© 2016, Adam Mickiewicz University Press. All rights reserved. Researchers in the field of instructed second language acquisition have been examining the issue of how learners interact with input by conducting research measuring particular kinds of instructional interventions (input-oriented and meaning-based). These interventions include such things as input flood, textual enhancement and processing instruction. Although the findings are not completely conclusive on whether these instructional interventions have an impact on acquisition, it is clear that we have witnessed a shift in the field from the original question “Does instruction make a difference?” to the more specific question “Does manipulating input make a difference?” In this article, the key classroom-based research conducted to measure the relative effects of different types of enhancement and manipulation is reviewed. Three main research foci are considered: (a) research measuring the effects of saturating the input with the target form (input flood), (b) research measuring the effects of different types of textual enhancements to draw learners’ attention to the target form, and (c) research measuring input restructuring to improve interpretation and processing of target forms or structures (processing instruction).-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofStudies in Second Language Learning and Teaching-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectTextual enhancement-
dc.subjectProcessing instruction-
dc.subjectInput flood-
dc.subjectInput enhancement-
dc.titleInput manipulation, enhancement and processing: Theoretical views and empirical research-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.14746/ssllt.2016.6.1.4-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85012024634-
dc.identifier.volume6-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage65-
dc.identifier.epage88-
dc.identifier.eissn2084-1965-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000375157000004-
dc.identifier.issnl2084-1965-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats